介于利益与价值之间--德国应对欧债危机举措的动因探析被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要对于德国在欧债危机应对中表现的解读,学界一直存在是"利益驱动"还是"价值导向"的争论。有鉴于此,本文依据现实主义和建构主义理论,分别从德国国家利益、德国秩序自由主义经济治理理念和反通胀文化,以及自反性多边主义出发,分析德国在欧债危机应对中表现的影响因素,并据此指出,组合现实主义和建构主义理论,可以更好地解释德国在欧债危机应对中介于利益与价值之间的行为。

作者郑春荣刘昊权

机构地区同济大学德国问题研究所欧盟问题研究所

出处《世界经济与政治论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第6期42-51,共10页 Forum of World Economics & Politics

关键词德国欧债危机现实主义建构主义现实建构主义

分类号 F815 [经济管理—财政学] F8151.6 [经济管理—财政学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1William E. Paterson, "The Reluctant Hegemon? Germany Moves Centre Stage in the European Union, Journal of Common Market Studies (JCMS), 2011, Volume 49 Annual Review, pp. 57 -75.
2William E. Paterson "Does Germany Still have a European Vocation'?" German Politics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2010, pp. 41 -52.
3Sebastian Dullien and Ulrike Gurrot, "The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany' s Approach to The Euro Crisis," ECFR Policy Brief, No. 49, European Council on Foreign Relations, February 2012.
4J. Samuel Barkin, Realist Constructivism: Rethinking International Relations Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
5Kenneth Waltz, "Realist Thought ,and Neorealist Theory," in Charles W. Kegley ( ed. ) , Controversies in International Relations Theory, New York : St. Martin' s Press, 1995, pp. 67 - 82, here p. 79.
6Gert Krell, Weltbilder und Weltordnung. Einfuerung in die Theorie der Internationalen Beziehungen, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2004, pp. 145 - 181.
7Gert Krell, Weltbilder und Weltordnung. Einfuerung in die Theorie der Internationalen Beziehungen, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellsehaft, 2004, pp. 345 -373.
8James P. March, Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press, 1989, pp. 160-162.
9Melanie Morisse-Schilbaeh, "Aeh Deutschland! Greece, the Euro Crisis, and the Costs and Benefits of Being a Benign Hegemon," Internationale Politik und Gesellsehafi, 1/2011, pp. 26 - 41.
10Sebastian Dullien, Ulrike Guerot, "The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany' s Approach to The Euro Crisis," ECFR Policy Brief, No. 49, European Council on Foreign Relations, February 2012.