摘要
《证券法》和《刑法》都对禁止的证券交易内幕行为做出了明文的规定,不过,我国立法者并未区分基本内幕人和派生内幕人,而且法律条文规定的也过于原则,在司法实务中很难对禁止的内幕交易行为予以判定。故此,应当将证券交易的内幕人主体区分为"法定内幕人"和"非法定内幕人",将禁止内幕交易行为区分为"禁止为自己和他人进行内幕交易"等,以合理界定禁止的内幕交易问题,保护投资人的合法权益。
The Chinese Legislators have in the "Securities Law" and "Criminal Law" established the inside trading system and statutory insider liability. However, the Chinese legislators did not distinguish between the first and second insider, meanwhile the legal provisions are too general and not conducive to the judicial code of conduct scientific definition of insider trading. Because of the complex nature of the securities market and insider trading diversity insider trading and securities law must be justified for a distinction between the first and second insider, in order to protect the interests of investors and the normal operation of the securities market.
出处
《福建江夏学院学报》
2012年第2期60-64,79,共6页
Journal of Fujian Jiangxia University
基金
上海市政府"国际金融中心法治环境"研究项目(20110901)