期刊文献+

理想与现实:教研组作为专业学习社群的批判反思 被引量:17

Ideal and Reality:Critical Reflection on Teaching and Research Groups as Professional Learning Communities
原文传递
导出
摘要 一定程度上,教研组具备了专业学习社群的诸多特质,可视为后者的中国模式。然而,行政权力的过度干预、精细化管理的过分推崇、以及华人社会和谐文化的无远弗届,使得该社群因素遭受重创。学校虽采取诸多措施,试图让教研组重新成为专业学习社群,无奈药不对症,致使两者渐行渐远。文章指出问题的症结在于忽视了实践中的教师专业性,呼吁要尊重教师自主发展空间,关注其在学校变革中的努力,如此才能使得教研组功能复归。 To some extent, Teaching and research groups (TRGs) manifest some characteristics of professional learning communities (PLCs), and could be regarded as the China model of PLCs. But TRGs are situated in a context of excessive interventions of executive power, increased concern over delicacy management, as well as harmonious culture in Chinese society. As a consequence, the community tradition of TRGs is suffered tremendously. Although schools adopt various measures to transform TRGs into PLCs, these measures fail to take effect. As a result, the path between TRGs and PLCs is blocked. The study suggests that the crux of the problem lies in teacher professionalism. The problem can be solved successfully only with schools respecting teachers' professional autonomy and agency, and keeping professional development space for teachers.
出处 《全球教育展望》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期51-59,共9页 Global Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(项目编号:09YJC880050) 江苏省教育科学规划重点项目(项目编号:B-a/2009/01/015)的阶段性成果
关键词 专业学习社群 教研组 专业性 教师合作 本土化 professional learning communities teaching and research groups professionalism teacher collaboration localization
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Giles, C. , & Hargreaves, A. The Sustainability of Innovative Schools as Learning Organizations and Profes- sional Learning Communities during Standardized Reform [J]. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2006, 42(1) : 124 -156.
  • 2陈桂生.我国教研组演变的轨迹.教育管理研究,2006,.
  • 3胡惠闵,刘群英.我国中小学教学研究组织的发展及其困境[J].教育发展研究,2012,32(2):1-8. 被引量:14
  • 4Lee, J. C. , Zhang, Z. , & Yin, H. A Muhilevel Analysis of the Impact of a Professional Learning Commu- nity, Faculty Trust in Colleagues and Collective Efficacy on Teacher Commitment to Students [ J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2011, 27:820-830.
  • 5Lauer, P. A. , & Dean, C. B. Teacher Quality Toolkit [M]. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning, 2004.
  • 6Dufour, R. , Dufour, R. , &Eaker, R. Revisiting Professional Learning Communities at Work [M]. Bloom- ington, IN : Solution Tree, 2008.
  • 7Little, J. W. Organizing Schools for Teacher Learning [ A ]. In L. D. Hammond & G. Sykes ( Eds. ), Teaching as a Learning Profession : Handbook of Policy and Practice [ C ]. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 2000.
  • 8Graham, P. Improving Teacher Effectiveness through Structured Collaboration: A Case Study of a Profession- al Learning Community [ J]. Research in Middle Level Education, 2007, 31 (1) : 1 -17.
  • 9Halversen, R. How Leaders Use Artifacts to Structure Professional Community in Schools [ A ]. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis ( Eds. ), Professional Learning Communities : Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas [ C ]. Maid- enhead: Open University Press, 2007:93 - 105.
  • 10Margolis, J. , & Doting, A. What Do Today's Teachers Want (And Not Want) From Teacher Leaders? [J].The New Educator, 2013, 9(3) : 192 -209.

二级参考文献55

共引文献69

同被引文献195

引证文献17

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部