期刊文献+

Myriad案与基因专利的未来 被引量:7

Research on the Case of Myriad and the Future of Gene Patents
原文传递
导出
摘要 Myriad案(Association for Molecular Pathology v.United States Patent and Trademark Office)是近几年美国生物及医药领域最受关注的案件。这不仅因为Myriad公司所持有的BRCA1/2基因专利与乳腺癌诊断密切相关,从而关系到无数女性的健康。更重要的,该案是对美国专利商标局授予基因专利权这一做法的全面挑战。详细分析地方法院与联邦巡回上诉法院的判决要旨、法官观点的差异及BRCA1/2基因的可专利性,进而对基因专利的未来做出判断。由于Myriad案所体现的问题对于包括我国在内的所有授予基因专利权的国家都具有普遍性,最后分析了该案对我国专利法制的借鉴意义。 The case of Myriad attracted most attentions of the American biotechnology and pharmaceuticals industries in recent years. It is not just because that BRCA1/2 gene patents held by Myriad are closely related with the diagnosis of breast cancer, and then concerns the health of numerous women. Also, this case brings whole challenges against the gene patent rights awarded by USPTO. In this paper, the judgments of district court and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the different opinions of judges, the patentability of Myriad gene patents and the future of gene patents in U. S were analyzed in detail. As the issues raised by the case of Myriad are universal to all countries, including China, which awarded gene patents, the reference significance of this case for patent law in our country was discussed finally.
作者 肇旭
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期144-152,共9页 Hebei Law Science
关键词 Myriad案 基因专利 可专利性 the case of Myriad gene patents patentability
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Natl org. for rare disorders, gene patenting: Nord policy position 1 , available at http://www, rarediseases, org/docs/poliey/.
  • 2Stifling or stimulating: the role of gene patents in research and genetic testing : hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, the Internet, and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Tenth Congress, first session, October 30, 2007.
  • 3Jacob D. Moore, The Forgotten Victim .in the Human Gene Patenting Debate: Pharmaceutical Companies, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1277 (2011).
  • 4孙昊亮.基因专利保护的利弊分析[J].河北法学,2005,23(7):144-147. 被引量:6
  • 5曹丽荣.我国基因专利保护范围界定的思考[J].河北法学,2010,28(12):104-110. 被引量:9
  • 6Eric J. Rogers, Can You Patent Genes? Yes and No, 93 J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc3' 19 (2010).

二级参考文献10

共引文献13

同被引文献191

引证文献7

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部