期刊文献+

焦虑敏感指数—3中文版在乳腺癌患者中的应用 被引量:4

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3(ASI-3) in Chinese Women with Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估焦虑敏感指数-3(ASI-3)中文版在乳腺癌患者中使用的信度和效度。方法:用焦虑敏感指数-3(ASI-3)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)对676名女性乳腺癌患者施测,初测两周后,从原样本中随机抽取50名女性进行重测。结果:全量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.94,3个分量表的Cronbach’sα系数在0.91-0.93之间;全量表的重测信度为0.86,3个分量表的重测信度在0.67-0.80之间;全量表条目间平均相关系数为0.49,3个分量表条目间平均相关系数在0.64-0.69之间。验证性因子分析各指标:CFI(0.941),NFI(0.929),TLI(0.929),RMSEA(0.083)均符合测量学要求,支持量表三因素模型的理论构想。焦虑敏感指数得分与焦虑症状之间显著正相关。结论:ASI-3具有很好的信度和效度,是评估我国女性乳腺癌患者焦虑敏感的可靠工具。 Objective: To assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Anxiety Sensitivity index-3 in Chi- nese women with breast cancer. Methods: The ASI-3 and HAMA were administrated to 676 women with breast cancer, and two weeks later, the ASI-3 was retested among 50 women sampling from the original sample. Results: The Cronbach's ct coefficient for the total scale was 0.94 and for the three subscales were ranged from 0.91-0.93; The two-week test-retest coefficient was 0.86 for the total scale and were from 0.67-0.80 for the subscales; The mean inter-item correlation coeffi- cient for the total scale was 0.49, and for the three subscales were ranged from 0.64-0.69. Results of confirmatory factor analysis such as CFI(0.94), NFI(0.929), TLI (0.929), RMSEA(0.083) confirmed the original three-factor model. Conclusion: The ASI-3 has good psychometric quality, which can be applied to assess anxiety sensitivity in Chinese women with breast cancer effectively.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期974-976,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 国家科技支撑计划(2009BAI77B06)资助
关键词 焦虑敏感 乳腺癌 信度 效度 Anxiety sensitivity index Breast cancer Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Reiss S. Expectancy model of fear,anxiety,and panic[J].Clinical Psychology Review,1991,(02):141-153.
  • 2Reiss S,Havercamp. The sensitivity theory of motivation:Implications for psychopathology[J].{H}Behaviour Research and Therapy,1996,(08):621-632.
  • 3李茜茜,郭兰婷,冯正直,张大均,吴明霞,舒建民.焦虑敏感问卷中文版的信度和效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(10):675-678. 被引量:20
  • 4温翠琪,李而瑾,黄建美,陈君填,郑白鸽.乳腺癌患者围手术期焦虑与社会支持的相关性研究[J].中国实用护理杂志(下旬版),2005,21(4):3-4. 被引量:58
  • 5Reiss S. Anxiety sensitivity,anxiety frequency and the prediction of fearfulness[J].{H}Behaviour Research and Therapy,1986,(01):1-8.
  • 6Taylor S,Cox BJ. An expanded anxiety sensitivity index:Evidence for a hierarchic structure in a clinical sample[J].{H}Journal of Anxiety Disorders,1998,(05):463-483.
  • 7Lim Y,Kim J. Korean anxiety sensitivity index-3:Its factor structure,reliability,and validity in non-clinical samples[J].Psychiatric Symptomatology,2012.45-53.
  • 8Taylor S,Zvolensky M J,Cox B J. Robust dimensions of anxiety sensitivity:Development and initial validation of the anxiety sensitivity index-3[J].{H}Psychological Assessement,2007,(02):176-188.
  • 9王纯,楚艳民,张亚林,张宁,张婕,杨华,季伟华.汉密尔顿焦虑量表的因素结构研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2011,21(5):299-301. 被引量:488
  • 10Costa PT,McCrae RR. Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory(NEO-FFI) professional manual[M].Odessa,FL:Psychological Assessment Resources,1992.101.

二级参考文献62

  • 1王登峰.人格特质研究的大五因素分类[J].心理科学进展,1994,4(1):34-41. 被引量:59
  • 2戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16~20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量:21
  • 3汪春运.每日口服文拉法辛75mg出现尿路症状1例[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2005,24(4):336-336. 被引量:4
  • 4张雅明,俞国良.《儿童元认知问卷》的编制与修订[J].应用心理学,2005,11(3):241-246. 被引量:12
  • 5John OP, Naumann LR, Soto CJ. Paradigm shift to the Integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual Issues. In John OP, Robins RW, Pervin LA. Handbook of personality: Theory and research(3th). New York: The Guilford Press, 2008. 114-158.
  • 6McCrae RR, Terracciano A. 78 members of the personality profiles. Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2005, 88(3): 547-561.
  • 7McCrae RR, Costa PT More reasons to adopt the five-factor model. American Psychologist, 1998, 53:451--452.
  • 8Comrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1998, 56:754-761.
  • 9McCrae RR, Herbst JH, Costa PT. Effects of acquiescence on personality factor structures. In Riemann R, Ostendorf F, Spinath F. Personality and temperament: Genetics, evolution, and structure. Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers, 2001.
  • 10王需成 楚艳民 戴晓阳.严谨性(Conscientiousness)人格特征的结构及应用研究述评(审稿中)[J].心理科学进展,.

共引文献666

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部