期刊文献+

情绪识别与认知重评对社会适应不良的预测研究(英文) 被引量:12

Emotion Recognition and Cognitive Reappraisal Predict Social Maladjustment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考查认知重评策略使用频率与情绪识别能力对社会适应不良的预测作用。方法:被试来自于西北师范大学199名大学生,其中,男生83人,占总人数41.7%;年龄18-26岁之间(M=20.84,SD=1.45);199名被试中,汉族183人,占总人数92%;少数民族16人。研究将采用多伦多述情障碍量表中情绪识别分量表、情绪调节量表中的认知重评分量表以及明尼苏达多相个性测查表中社会适应不良分量表测查了个体的情绪识别、认知重评以及社会适应不良。结果:认知重评使用频率低与不良的社会适应相关;情绪识别能力低与不良的社会适应相关;逐步多元回归发现,认知重评策略使用和情绪识别能力解释社会适应不良18%的变异,可以预测社会适应不良。结论:在本研究中,我们发现情绪识别和认知重评与社会适应不良之间存在显著先关,其中,情绪识别能力越低,社会适应不良越严重;认知重评能力策略使用越少,社会适应不良越严重。另外,研究还发现,情绪识别与认知重评对社会适应不良具有显著的预测作用。本研究直接探讨了情绪识别、认知重评与社会适应不良之间的关系。虽然,之前的一些研究并未直接探讨三者的关系,但是,这个结果与之间的一些研究结论相符。 This study investigated the predictive role of emotion recognition and cognitive reappraisal in social malad- justment. An individual' s emotion recognition, cognitive reappraisal and social maladjustment were examined by using the Toronto Alexithymia Scale@AS), reappraisal subscale from Emotion Regulation Questionnaire(ERQ), and the social malad- justment subscale from Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory(MMPI). Based on a sample of 199 undergraduates, we found that the low frequency of using cognitive reappraisal is correlated with social maladjustment, as well as the low capac- ity of emotion recognition. The Stepwisc multiple regression revealed that cognitive reappraisal strategy and emotion recog- nition accounted 18% of the variance in social maladjustment, which could predict the occurrence of social maladjustment. However, there were no interactive effects of emotion recognition and cognitive reannraisal on social maladjustment.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期1029-1032,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 supported by the The Young Teacher Research Capacity Advancement Program of Northwest Normal University(SKQNYB12009) Open Research Fund of the Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology
关键词 社会适应不良 情绪调节 情绪识别 认知重评 Social maladjustment Emotion regulation Emotional clarity Cognitive reappraisal
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献14

  • 1Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholo- gy, 2003, 85:348-362.
  • 2Decker ML, Turk CL, Hess B, et al. Emotion regulation am- ong individuals classified with and without generalized anx- iety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 2008, 22(3): 485-494.
  • 3Campbell-Sills L, Barlow DH, Brown TA, et al. Effects ofsuppression and acceptance of emotional responses of indi- viduals with anxiety and mood disorders. Behavior Research and Therapy, 2005, 44:1251-1263.
  • 4Legerstee JS, Garnefski N, Jellesma FC, et al. Cognitive coping and childhood anxiety disorders. European Child Adolescent Psychiatry, 2010, 19:143-150.
  • 5Mauss IB, Bunge SA, Gross JJ. Automatic emotion regula- tion. Social and Personality Psychology, Compass, 2007, 1: 146-167.
  • 6Gross JJ. Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is every- thing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2001, 10 (6): 214-219.
  • 7Mauss IB, Cook CL, Gross JJ. Automatic emotion regulation during anger provocation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2007, 43(5): 698-711.
  • 8姚雨佳.无意识情绪调节:认知重评和表达抑制调整情绪反应.杭州师范大学硕士论文.2011.
  • 9Carthy T, Horesh N, Apter A, et al. Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation in anxious children. Behaviour Rese- arch and Therapy, 2010, 48:384-393.
  • 10Zlomke KR, Hahn KS. Cognitive emotion regulation strate- gies: Gender differences and associations to worry. Person- ality and Individual Differences, 2010, 48:408-413.

共引文献13

同被引文献198

引证文献12

二级引证文献126

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部