期刊文献+

Simulation study on three casting processes for a marine propeller hub body 被引量:2

Simulation study on three casting processes for a marine propeller hub body
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The mold filling and solidification process of a marine propeller hub were simulated using ProCAST. Three casting processes–gravity casting, centrifugal casting and low pressure casting–were compared in order to get the best process. The heat transfer coefficient of the casting/mold interface was determined using a reverse method. The simulated results of velocity, temperature and shrinkage porosity distribution were discussed in detail for the three casting processes. A smooth filling was found in all three casting processes, especially the low pressure casting exhibiting a better filling performance than the other two, but the solidification processes were different. The casting did not experience the sequential solidification, and the feeding paths were blocked, leading to shrinkage porosity defects in the riser and the bottom of the casting in gravity casting and in the upper zone of the casting in low pressure casting. While, the sequential solidification was well controlled in the solidification process of centrifugal casting, and majority of the shrinkage porosity defects can only be observed in the riser. It could be concluded that the centrifugal casting process is the most suitable casting process for the production of propeller hub body. The casting experiments verified the simulation results, and a defect-free propeller hub was obtained by centrifugal casting with a rotational speed of 150 r·min-1. The mold filling and solidification process of a marine propeller hub were simulated using ProCAST. Three casting processes - gravity casting, centrifugal casting and low pressure casting - were compared in order to get the best process. The heat transfer coefficient of the casting/mold interface was determined using a reverse method. The simulated results of velocity, temperature and shrinkage porosity distribution were discussed in detail for the three casting processes. A smooth filling was found in all three casting processes, especially the low pressure casting exhibiting a better filling performance than the other two, but the solidification processes were different. The casting did not experience the sequential solidification, and the feeding paths were blocked, leading to shrinkage porosity defects in the riser and the bottom of the casting in gravity casting and in the upper zone of the casting in low pressure casting. While, the sequential solidification was well controlled in the solidification process of centrifugal casting, and majority of the shrinkage porosity defects can only be observed in the riser. It could be concluded that the centrifugal casting process is the most suitable casting process for the production of propeller hub body. The casting experiments verified the simulation results, and a defect-free propeller hub was obtained by centrifugal casting with a rotational speed of 150 r.min-1.
出处 《China Foundry》 SCIE CAS 2013年第6期360-366,共7页 中国铸造(英文版)
基金 financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.51274054,U1332115,51271042,and 51375070) the Key Grant Project of Chinese Ministry of Education,China(No.313011) the Science and Technology Planning Project of Dalian(2013A16GX110)
关键词 propeller hub body numerical simulation ProCAST propeller hub body numerical simulation ProCASEe
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

共引文献76

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部