期刊文献+

超声靶向微泡破坏增强万古霉素活性治疗生物膜感染的实验研究 被引量:2

Enhancement of vancomycin activity in biofilm using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声靶向微泡破坏(UTMD)增强万古霉素活性治疗生物膜感染的效果。方法应用超声靶向微泡分组处理RP62A生物膜,结晶紫染色后OD570半定量检测,肉眼、光镜及激光共聚焦扫描显微镜观察生物膜的形态与细菌存活情况,菌落形成单位计数进一步对其内存活细菌进行定量检测。结果各超声或超声+微泡组的生物膜可见许多微孔,其中超声+微泡组和万古霉素+超声组生物膜微孔显著较大,OD570半定量检测表明超声+微泡组和万古霉素+超声+微泡组生物膜A。值最低(P〈0.01)。共聚焦激光扫描显微镜观察证实了生物膜微孔的存在,万古霉素+超声+微泡组较其他各组有更多的死菌(P〈0.01)。菌落形成单位计数进一步证实了上述结果。结论UTMD可有效提高抗生素活性,杀灭表皮葡萄球菌生物膜内细菌。 Objective To investigated whether ultrasound (US)-targeted microhubble (MB) destruction (UTMD) can enhance antibiotic activity. Methods Twenty-four hours biofilms of S. epidermidis RP62A were treated with different parameters in 6 groups. After the treatments, the absorbance values (A570) of biofilms stained with the crystal violet were measured to assess the density of biofilms. The biofilms were observed under macroscopy and light microscopy, and the morphology of biofilms were also examined and analyzed by eonfocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM). The viable log10CFU among biofilms in different groups were compared. Results Many micropores were found in the biofilms treated with US and/or MB group. Even bigger micropores could be found in the hiofilms of US + MB group and vancomycin+ US + MB group, with even smaller A570 values (P (0.01). The CLSM examination confirmed the existence of the micropores and showed that the highest proportions of dead ceils were found in the vancomycin + MB + US group, and the results were confirmed further by the experiments of viable logl0CFU counts of biofilms. Conclusions UTMD might have a great potential in increasing antibiotic activity and reducing viable bacteria in biofilm.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期1080-1084,共5页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 国家自然科学基金(81271594) 安徽省自然科学基金(1208085MH159)
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 生物膜 万古霉素 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Biofilms Vancomycin
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: acommon cause of persistent infections. Science,1999,284:1318-1322.
  • 2Schierholz JM, Beuth J. Implant infections: a haven foropportunistic bacteria. J Hosp Infect, 2001,49: 87-93.
  • 3Carmen JC, Roeder BL, Nelson JL, et al. Treatment of biofilminfections on implants with low-frequency ultrasound andantibiotics. Am J Infect Control,2005,33:78-82.
  • 4叶银存,余加林,刘立婷,郜向娜.低频超声联合盐酸氨溴索对表皮葡萄球菌生物被膜的影响[J].中国超声医学杂志,2012,28(7):581-584. 被引量:4
  • 5Tojo M, Yamashita N, Goldmann D A, et al. Isolation andcharacterization of a capsular polysaccharide adhesin fromStaphylococcus epidermidis. J Infect Dis, 1988,157-.713-722.
  • 6Patel JD, Ebert M,Ward R,et al. S. epidermidis biofilmformation: effects of biomaterial surface chemistry and serumproteins. J Biomed Mater Res A ,2007,80:742-751.
  • 7Qian Z,Sagers RD, Pitt WG. Investigation of the mechanism ofthe bioacoustic effect. J Biomed Mater Res, 1999,44 : 198-205.
  • 8Qian Z’Stoodley P, Pitt WG. Effect of low-intensity ultrasoundupon biofilm structure from confocal scanning laser microscopyobservation. Biomaterials, 1996,17:1975-1980.
  • 9Williams RG’Pitt WG. In vitro response of Escherichia coli toantibiotics and ultrasound at various insonation intensities. JBiomater Appl,1997,12:20-30.
  • 10Dong Y,Chen S,Wang Z,et al. Synergy of ultrasoundmicrobubbles and vancomycin against Staphylococcusepidermidis biofilm. J Antimicrob Chemother,2013,68 :816-826.

二级参考文献7

  • 1(YGara, J P, Humphreys. H. Staphylococcus epidermidis bio- films : importance and implications. Med Microbiol, 2001,50 : 582 -587.
  • 2Borriello G E, Werner E, Roe F, et al. Oxygen limitation con tributes to antibiotic tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in bio- films. Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2004,48(7) :2659-2664.
  • 3Hendriks JGE, Ensing GT, van Horn JR et al. Increased release of gentamicin from acrylic bone cements under influence of low frequency ultrasound. Control Release, 2003,92 : 369-374.
  • 4Ensing GT, Roeder BL, Nelson JL et al. Effect of pulsed ultra- sound in combination with gentamicin on bacterial viability in bio- films on bone cement in vivo. Appl Microbiol,2005,99: 443-448.
  • 5J. C. Carmen, J. L. Nelson, B.L. Beckstead, et al. Ultrasonic- enhanced gentamicin transport through colony biofilms of Pseudo- monas aeruginosa and Eseherichia coli. Infect Chemother, 2004. 10(4) : 193-199.
  • 6Hernot S. Klibanov AL. Microbubbles in ultrasound triggered drug and gane delivery. Adv Drug Ddiv Rev, 2008,60 ( 10 ) : 1153- 1166.
  • 7Funke AP. Gunther C. Muller RH, et al. In vitro release and transdermal fluxes of a highly lipophilic drug and of enhancers from mat rix TDS. Control Release, 2002,82 (1) : 63.

共引文献3

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部