期刊文献+

超声诊断腹膜粘连的临床评价--20年文献分析 被引量:7

Clinical Evaluation of Ultrasound in Diagnosing Peritoneal Adhesions: a Review of Literatures in the Past 20 Years
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对20年来腹膜粘连超声评价的有关文献分析,探讨超声评价腹膜粘连的临床意义。共29篇文献纳入分析,分为3类:超声评价腹膜粘连的方法学研究,以超声观察"内脏滑动"方法研究腹腔镜手术入路的安全性,对超声诊断腹腔内粘连的评价。通过对这些文献的分析与总结,得出以下结论:以内脏纵向滑动距离<1 cm作为诊断腹膜粘连的标准;对腹壁局部进行重点超声扫查是目前比较合理的策略;临床上可用于术前评估腹部手术、腹腔镜入路的安全性,还可用于防粘连效果的评估。 To explore the clinical significance of ultrasound in evaluating peritoneal adhesions by analyzing related literatures of the past 20 years. A total of 29 literatures were reviewed, which were divided into 3 categories : methodology research on ultrasonic evaluation of peritoneal adhesions, research on the safety of laparoscopic surgery approach by ultrasonic assessment of Visceral sliding, and research on abdominal adhesions diagnosed by uhrasonography. By analyzing and summarizing all these literatures, the following conclusions were drawn: visceral longitudinal sliding distance of less than 1 cm is regarded as a diagnostic standard for peritoneal adhesions; ultrasound scanning of the local abdominal wall is a reasonable strategy for diagnosing visceral adhesions in the abdomen; ultrasound scanning of the abdominal wall can be used to evaluate the safety of abdominal operation and laparoscopic surgery preoperatively, as well as the anti-adhesion effect.
出处 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2013年第12期1061-1064,1068,共5页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
关键词 腹膜粘连 超声 内脏滑动 Peritoneal adhesions Uhrasonography Visceral slide
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions-how big is the problem? Ann R Coil Surg Engl, 1990,72:60 -63.
  • 2Monk B J, Berman ML, Montz FJ. Adhesions after extensive gynecologic surgery: clinical significance, etiology, and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1994,170 : 1396 - 1403.
  • 3Jansen FW, Kolman W, Bakkum EA, et al. Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed versus open entry technique. Am J Obstet Gyneco1,200g, 190 (3) :634 - 638.
  • 4Chandler JG, Corson SL, Way LW. Three spectra of laparoscopic entry access injuries. J Am Coil Surg,2001,192 :478 -490.
  • 5van Goor H. Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis, 2007,9 ( Suppl 2 ) : S25 - S34.
  • 6Sigel B, Golub RM, Loiacono LA, et al. Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions. Surg Endosc, 1991,5:161 - 165.
  • 7王光霞.粘连性肠梗阻的超声诊断[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(4):696-710. 被引量:11
  • 8Aube C, Pessaux P, Tuech JJ, et al. Detection of peritoneal adhesions using ultrasound examination for the evaluation of an innovative intraperitoneal mesh. Surg Endosc,2008,18:131 -135.
  • 9Lang R, Baumann P, Jauch KW , et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind phase Ⅰ - Ⅱ clinical trial on the safety ofA-Part- Gel as adhesion prophylaxis after major abdominal surgery versus non-treated group. BMC Surgery,2010,10:20.
  • 10Uberoi R, D' Costa H, Brown C, Dubbins P, et al. Visceral slide fur intraperitoneal adhesions? A prospective study in 48 patients with surgical correlation. J Clin Uhrasound,1995,23:363 -366.

二级参考文献45

共引文献71

同被引文献62

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部