期刊文献+

暴力危险性筛查量表中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度与效度研究 被引量:9

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the violence risk screening-10 in patients with schizophreni-a
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:引入暴力危险性筛查量表(violenceriskscreening-10,V—RISK-10),对V—RISK-10中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度与效度进行检验。方法:对英文版V—RISK-10进行翻译和修订,以109例精神分裂症患者为评估对象,完成一般情况调查表、V—RISK-10中文版、卫生部危险性评估、修订版外显行为攻击量表(MOAS)的测评。其中14例患者由2位评估者独立评估V—RISK-10中文版,49例患者2周后重测V—RISK.10中文版。结果:V—RISK-10中文版9个条目的鉴别力良好,内部一致性系数0.833(P〈0.01)。评分者信度(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数:r=0.655—0.899)、重测信度(Kappa=0.536—1.000)较好(P〈0.ol或P〈0.05)。V—RISK.10中文版中7个条目得分与其综合评定建议分级(Kendal和谐系数为0.387~0.685)、危险性评估分级(Kendal和谐系数为0.319~0.618)、MOAS总分(皮尔逊相关系数:,=0,301~0.585)均显著正性相关(P均〈0.01);关联效度理想。结论:V—RISK-10中文版在精神分裂症患者中的信度与关联效度良好。 Objective: To introduce violence risk screening-10(V-RISK-10), and to evaluate the relia- bility and validity of Chinese version of the V-RISK-10 in patients with schizophrenia. Method:The English version of the V-RISK-10 was translated into simplified Chinese and was revised to the final version. 109 cases of schizophrenia patients were investigated by the Chinese version of the V-RISK-10, modified overt aggression scales (MOAS) ,the risk assessment issued by ministry of health. To examine the rater reliability the 14 cases assessed by 2 assessors separately. To examine the test-retest reliability the 49 cases assessed after two weeks. Results :Item analysis demonstrated 9 items of the Chinese version of the V-RISK-10 had a good discrim- inability. Cronbach~ alpha coefficient was 0. 833 ( P 〈 0.01 ). Rater reliability : Spearman rank correlation coeffi- cients were from 0.655 to 0. 899. Test-retest reliability : weighted Kappa indexes for items were from 0. 536 to 1. 000( P 〈 0.01 or P 〈 0.05). Each score of 7 items of the Chinese version of the V-RISK-10 was significantly related to the grade based on comprehensive assessment, the classification in the risk assessment, and the total score of MOAS ( KendallS concordance coefficients were from 0. 387 to 0. 685, from 0. 319 to 0. 618, Pearson correlation coefficient :r =0. 301-0.585) (all P 〈0.01 ). Conclusion:The Chinese version of the V-RISK-10 in patients with schizophrenia has satisfactory reliability and validity.
出处 《临床精神医学杂志》 2013年第6期361-364,共4页 Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
基金 南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK10116) 国家临床重点专科建设项目(精神科 卫生部医政司2011-873) 江苏省医学重点学科(精神病学 江苏省卫生厅2011-12)
关键词 精神分裂症 危险性评估 暴力危险筛查量表 信度 效度 schizophrenia risk assessment violence risk screening reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献38

  • 1张燕红,杨惠敏,郑宪萍.精神病患者暴力行为研究现状[J].中国护理管理,2007,7(3):29-30. 被引量:14
  • 2Morrison EF.Violent poychiatric inpatients in a public hospital[J].Sch Inq Nurs Pract,1990,4(1):65-86.
  • 3Anderson TR,Bell CC,Powell TE,et al.Assessing psychiatric patients for violcnce[J].Community Ment Health J,2004,40(4):379-399.
  • 4Hart SD,The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence:con ceptual and methodological issues[J].Legal and Criminological Psycholo Sy,1998,3(Part1):121-137.
  • 5Watt A,Topping-Morris B,Rogers P,et al.Pre-admission nursing assessment in a Welsh Medium Secure Unit(1991-2000):Part 2-comparison of traditional nursing assessment with the HCR-20 risk assessment tool[J].Int J Nurs Stud,2003,40(6):657-662.
  • 6Monahan J.The prediction of violent behavior:toward a second generation of theory and policy[J].Am J Peychiatry,1984,141(1):10-15.
  • 7Doyle M,Dolan M.Violence risk assessment:combining actuarial and clinical information to structure clinical judgmenta for the formulation and management of risk[J].J Paychiatr Ment Health Nurs,2002,9(6):649-657.
  • 8Grove WM,Meehl PE.Comparative ef?ciency of informal(subjective,impressionistic)and formal(mechanical,algorithmic)prediction proeedures:the clinical-statistical controversy[J].Psychology,Public Policy,and Law,1996,2(2):293-323.
  • 9Kumar S,Simp on AL Application of risk assessment for violence methods to Seneral adult psychiatry:a selective literature review[J],Aust ralian and New Zealend Journal of IealerPaychiatry,2005.39(5):328-335,.
  • 10Douglas K,Cox D,Webster C.Violence risk assessment:science and practice[J].Legal and Criminological Psychology,1999,4:184-194.

共引文献49

同被引文献176

引证文献9

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部