摘要
目的:观察双导丝插管技术在ERCP选择性胆管插管困难中的应用效果及护理配合要点。方法:选择行ERCP治疗的患者,对常规导丝引导切开刀选择性胆总管插管失败且导丝3次进入胰管者,保留胰管导丝,再次用第2根导丝引导切开刀进行选择性胆总管插管,并比较双导丝法与常规插管方法的成功率及术后胰腺炎发生率。结果:73例治疗性ERCP中,常规插管成功51例,22例为插管困难性ERCP,对导丝3次进入胰管者采用双导丝技术行胆管深插管有16例,成功15例,两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在常规插管方法患者中有2例术后发生胰腺炎,在双导丝方法中也有2例发生术后胰腺炎,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:双导丝插管是常规胆总管深插管失败后比较可靠的一种补偿方法,可以提高困难性ERCP诊治的成功率,术中娴熟的护理配合技巧是保证双导丝插管法行困难ERCP成功的关键。
Objective:To observe the effect of the double-guidewire technique in difficult biliary cannulation and it's nursing methods.Method.'a catheter, pre-inserted with a guidewire was used for standard binary canulatio^pa- tients who failed standard binary canulation within 10 min and guidewire were inserted into pancreatic ducts for 3 times, were defined difficult binary canulation.Then a guide was left in pancreatic duct.catheter, pre-inserted with another guidewire, was used for the second binary canulation.And compare the successful rate and post ERCP pan- creatitis rate of the two canulation methods.Result:of the total 73 patients,51 patients were successful by standard canulation,and 22 patient were difficult canulation cases.In 22 difficult patients,15 cases were canulated successful- ly by double-guidewire technique.The successful rate of canulation were significant different between two groups (P〈0.O5).Difference of the post ERCP pancreatitis rate between two groups was not significant (P〉O.OS).Conclusion: double-guidewire technique can improve the successful rate of ERCP canulation when standard canulation failed.
出处
《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》
2013年第6期69-70,共2页
Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词
双导丝插管
困难ERCP
护理配合
Double-gnidewire eanulation
Difficuh binary canulation
Nursing