期刊文献+

基于博彩实证的前景理论价值函数分析

An Analysis on the Value Function of the Prospect Theory Based on the Gambling Empirical Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 前景理论对赌博、保险行为的解释主要依赖于权重函数,而一些研究对权重函数及累积前景理论提出有力质疑,这表明问题的关键可能在于价值函数。为此,本文以福彩为实证研究对象,针对前景理论的相关理论逻辑,对价值函数的形态展开实证分析。实证研究的结果表明,价值函数曲线不是简单的S型,而是存在多次反转,类似于前景理论S型价值函数和Markowitz通用财富理论效用函数的一种混合结构,这意味着风险态度会随着损益额的增长而出现多次反转。 Prospect Theory mainly depends on insurance, but some research results raise important Prospect Theory, this also meahs that the S -shaped the weight function to explain the behavior of gambling and questions about the weighting function and the Cumulative value function is inaccurate. Therefore, this paper analyzes the value function based on a gambling empirical study whose research object is the lottery. Empirical study shows that the value function curve is not a simple S - shaped , there are many reversals, which is similar to a hybrid structure of the S - shaped value function of Prospect Theory and the utility function of Markowitz Custom- ary Wealth Theory. This means that the risk attitude would appear multiple inversions along with the expansion of profit or loss.
作者 许捷 李玉菲
机构地区 保险职业学院
出处 《保险职业学院学报》 2013年第6期5-8,共4页 Journal of Insurance Professional College
基金 湖南省高等学校科学研究项目<基于行为经济学理论的保险问题研究>(09C1050)
关键词 价值函数 权重函数 反转 The value function The weighting function Reversal
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Allais M. Le comportement de l' Homme rationnel devantle Risque,Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Américaine[J].{H}ECONOMETRICA,1953,(04):503-546.
  • 2Brandstatter Eduard,Anton Kühberger. Outcome Priority in Risky Choice[J].Working Paper,2004.
  • 3Friedman,M,L.J.Savage. The Utiliy Analysis of Choices Involving Risk[J].{H}JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY,1948,(56):279-304.
  • 4Heath Timothy B,Subimal Chatterjee. Mathematization' s Treat to Behavioral Science:Of Epicycles and Probability Weights[R].2005.
  • 5Kahneman,Daniel,Amos Tversky. Prospect Theory:An Analysis of Decision under Risk[J].{H}ECONOMETRICA,1979,(02):263-292.
  • 6Markowitz,H.M. The Utility of Wealth[J].{H}JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY,1952,(02):151-158.
  • 7Tversky,A,Kahneman,D. Advances in Prospect Theory:Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty[J].{H}JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY,1992,(05):297-323.
  • 8Wu George,Alex B.Markle. An Empirical Test of Gain-Loss Separbailiyt in Prospect Theory[R].2004.
  • 9边慎,蔡志杰.期望效用理论与前景理论的一致性[J].经济学(季刊),2005,5(1):265-276. 被引量:18
  • 10李纾,毕研玲,梁竹苑,孙彦,汪祚军,郑蕊.无限理性还是有限理性?--齐当别抉择模型在经济行为中的应用[J].管理评论,2009,21(5):103-114. 被引量:22

二级参考文献55

  • 1李纾.艾勒悖论(Allais Paradox)另释[J].心理学报,2001,33(2):176-181. 被引量:17
  • 2毕研玲,李纾.有限理性的“占优启发式”和“齐当别”决策模型的作为——当Allais悖论杠杆撬动了期望效用理论[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):682-688. 被引量:16
  • 3Houston, D. A., S. J. Sherman. Cancellation and focus: The role of shared and unique features in the choice process[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995, 31:357-378
  • 4Houston, D. A, S. J. Sherman, and S. M. Baker. Feature matching, unique features, and the dynamics of the choice process: Predecision conflict and postdecision satisfaction[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1991, 27:411-430
  • 5Li, S., R. Zheng, and L-B, Li. Do shared features of offered alternatives have an effect in consumer choice? [J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2007, 28(6): 658-677
  • 6Frederick, S., G. Loewenstein, and T. Odonoghue. Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2002, 40(2): 351-401
  • 7McClure, S. M., D. I. Laibson, G. Loewenstein, and J. D. Cohen. Separate Neural Systems Value Immediate and Delayed Monetary Rewards[J]. Science, 2004, 306(5695): 503-507
  • 8Loewenstein, G., R. H. Thaler. Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice[J]. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1989, 3(4): 181-193
  • 9Tversky, A., S. Sattath, and P. Slovic. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice[J]. Psychological Review, 1988, 95(3): 371- 384
  • 10Sloman S. A. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1996, 119:3-22

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部