期刊文献+

健康信息素养自评量表的编制及其信效度检验 被引量:56

Development of health information literacy self-rating scale and its reliability and validity test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编制适合我国国情的居民健康信息素养自评量表,并探讨其信、效度。方法基于美国医学图书馆协会提出的健康信息素养理论,设计量表概念框架,筛选健康信息素养自评量表条目,最终形成29个条目的健康信息素养自评量表,对湖南省长沙市的367位社区居民进行问卷调查。应用探索性因子分析和结构方程模型对量表效度进行检验,应用内部一致性和重测信度对量表信度进行检验。结果探索性因子分析抽取的5个因子解释总变异的61.855%,分别描述了个体的健康信息意识、获取、评价、应用和道德;量表的结构方程模型拟合较好(χ2=410.256,df=367,P=0.059,χ2/df=1.113,GFI=0.879,AGFI=0.897,RMSEA=0.024);健康信息素养总分及5个子维度的Cronbach’s α系数均在0.75以上,重测信度在0.67~0.79之间。结论所编制的健康信息素养量表具有较好的信度和效度。 [Objective] To develop the health information literacy self-rating scale, which suit for Chinese residents, and discuss the scale's reliability and validity. [Methods ] Based on the health information literacy theory put forward by the Medical Library Association, design conceptual framework of the scale and screen the items of self-rating scale, finally forms the health information literacy self-rating scale concluded 29 items. Carry out a questionnaire survey to 367 community residents in some district in Changsha. Applied exploratory factor analysis and structural equation model to test scale validity, and applied interual consistency test and Test-retest reliability to test the scale reliability. [Results] Exploratory factor analysis to extract five factors explain 61.855% of the total variance, describes the individual's health information consciousness, access, evaluation, application and morality respectively; Scale's structural equation model fitting is good (χ2=410.256, df=367, P =0.059, χ2/df=1.113, GFI= 0.879, AGFI=0.897, RMSEA=0.024); the Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the health information literacy and 5 sub- dimensions above 0.75 respectively and test-retest reliability between 0.67 and 0.79. [Conclusions] The health information literacy self-rating scale has a relatively good reliability and validity.
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第30期89-93,共5页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
基金 湖南省科技计划重点项目:湖南省居民健康信息素养专家系统的设计与实现(No:2012SK2004) 中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(No:2013zzts075)
关键词 健康信息素养 自评量表 信度 效度 health information literacy self-rating scale reliability: validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献7

  • 1American Association of School Librarians. Information Literacy Standards for Student Learning. http://www.ala.org/ala/aasl/aaslproftools/information- power/InformationLiteracyStandards- final.pdf,2007 - 03 - 10
  • 2Association of College and Research Libraries. Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. http://www.ala. org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/ standards.pdf,2007 - 03 - 15
  • 3Association of College and Research Libraries. Information Literacy Standards for Science and Engineering/Technology. http://www.ala. org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/infolitscitech.htm,2007 - 03-20
  • 4Colorado Department of Education. Colorado Information Literacy Standards. http://ww.cde.state.co.us/listandards/dowttload/pdf4.pdf,2007 - 03 - 25
  • 5Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. 1989- 1 - 10. 2007 - 01 - 10 http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlpubs/whitepapers/presidential. htm
  • 6何高大.“美国高等教育信息素养能力标准”及其启示[J].现代教育技术,2002,12(3):24-29. 被引量:168
  • 7王朴.美国信息素质标准简析[J].图书情报知识,2004,21(1):29-31. 被引量:23

共引文献30

同被引文献626

引证文献56

二级引证文献268

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部