期刊文献+

资源效率对企业绩效的影响:基于环境动态性调节分析 被引量:16

The Impacts of Resource Efficiency on Corporate Performance Based on the Moderator of Environmental Dynamism
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于资源效率和企业绩效的关系,现有理论分析和实证结果均存在明显分歧。本文分析了存货、生产、营销和人力资源效率对企业绩效的影响,并讨论了环境动态性的调节效应。以我国制造业542家上市公司为研究对象,利用2003-2010年的数据进行实证检验。结果表明:资源效率和企业绩效之间并非简单的线性相关,两者之间存在倒置U型关系。环境动态性对资源效率和企业绩效之间的关系有显著调节作用,动态性弱化了资源效率对企业绩效的正向影响,强化了资源效率对企业绩效的负向影响。 Concerning the relationship between resource efficiency and corporate performance, extant research results have obvious diver- gence. This paper analyzes the impacts of inventory, production, marketing and human resource efficiency on corporate performance within a single framework, and also discusses the moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Then we select data from 542 manufac- turing listed firms for the period 2003-2010 to conduct an empirical test. Results show that the relationship between resource efficiency and corporate performance is in an inverted U shape, not simply in a linear shape. Environmental dynamism has significant moderating effect on the nonlinear relationship. Dynamism weakens the positive impacts of resource efficiency on performance and strengthens the negative impacts of resource efficiency on performance.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期87-97,共11页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(71031004) 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(71221001) 教育部创新研究群体项目(IRT0916) 湖南省创新群体项目(09JJT02)
关键词 资源效率 企业绩效 环境动态性 调节效应 resource efficiency, corporate performance, environmental dynamism, moderating effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Nohria N,Gulati R. Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation[J].{H}ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL,1996,(05):1245-1264.
  • 2Modi S.B,Mishra S. What Drives Financial Performance-Resource Efficiency or Resource Slack? Evidence from U.S.Based Manufacturing Finns from 1991 to 2006[J].{H}Journal of Operations Management,2011,(03):254-273.
  • 3Capkun V,Hameri A,Weiss L.A. On the Relationship between Inventory and Financial Performance in Manufacturing Companies[J].{H}International Journal of Operations & Production Management,2009,(08):789-806.
  • 4Hendricks K.B,Singhal V.R. Demand-Supply Mismatches and Stock Market Reaction:Evidence from Excess Inventory Annoancements[J].{H}Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,2009,(03):509-524.
  • 5Love E.G,Nohria N. Reducing Slack:The Performance Consequences of Downsizing by Large Industrial Firms,1977-93[J].{H}Strategic Management Journal,2005,(12):1087-1108.
  • 6Srinivasan S,Hanssens D.M. Marketing and Firm Value:Metrics,Methods,Findings,and Future Directions[J].{H}JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH,2009,(03):293-312.
  • 7Adler P.S,Benner M,Brunner D.J. Perspectives on the Productivity Dilemma[J].{H}Journal of Operations Management,2009,(02):99-113.
  • 8Bourgeois L.J. On the Measurement of Organizational Slack[J].{H}ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW,1981,(01):29-39.
  • 9Rosenzweig E.D,Easton G.S. Tradeoffs in Manufacturing? A Meta-analysis and Critique of the Literature[J].{H}PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT,2010,(02):127-141.
  • 10Narasimhan R,Talluri S. Perspectives on Risk Management in Supply Chains[J].{H}Journal of Operations Management,2009,(02):114-118.

共引文献455

同被引文献245

引证文献16

二级引证文献179

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部