期刊文献+

信息框架与产品风险的交互效应及影响条件 被引量:8

The Interactive Effect and Impact Condition of Message Framing and Product Risk
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于可得性-诊断性模型提出5个假设,通过实验方法收集数据,采用方差分析进行假设检验,探讨了信息框架与产品风险对广告态度的交互影响、交互影响产生的边界条件以及中介机制。实验1和实验2分别从受众的特质性和情境性调节定向两方面确认了,信息框架和产品风险对广告态度的交互影响:当产品高风险时,采用亏损框架做广告,广告说服力优于采用得益框架做广告;当产品低风险时,采用得益框架做广告,广告说服力优于采用亏损框架做广告。不过,这一交互影响仅限于进取定向显著的广告受众,而且通过诊断性中介。 This research investigates the interactive effect of message framing and product risk on attitude toward advertisement, the bQundary condition of this interactive effect and its underlying mechanism. It relies on aeeessibility-diagnosticity model to develop 5 hy- pothesis, colleetes data using two expriments, and analyses data using general linear model. Through measuring recipients' chronic regu- latory focus and priming recipients' temparory regulatory focus respectively, experiment 1 and 2 converge on findings that the interactive effect is restricted to recipients predominat on promotion focus. Particularly, for recipients dominant on promotion focus, loss-framing is more persusive than gain-framing to advocate product high in risk; gain-framing is more persuasive than loss-framing to advocate product low in risk. Moreover, diagnosticity mediates the interactive effect of product risk and messge framing on attitude toward advertising.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第12期125-137,共13页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71132005)
关键词 信息框架 产品风险 广告态度 调节定向 可得性-诊断性模型 message framing, product risk, attitude towad advertisement, regulatory focus, accessibility-diagnosticity model
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Bartels R. D., Kelly K. M., Rothman A. J. Moving beyond the Function of the Health Behavior : The Effect of Message Frame on Behavioral Decision-Making[ J ]. Psychology & Health, 2010,25 (7) : 821-838.
  • 2Meyers-Levy J., Maheswaran D. Exploring Message Framing Outcomes : When Systematic, Heuristic, or Both Types of Processing Occur[ J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2004,14(1-2) : 159-167.
  • 3Block L. G., Keller P. When to Accentuate the Negative : The Effects of Perceived Efficacy and Message Framing on Intentions to Perform a Health-Related Behavior[ J ] Journal of Marketing Research, 1995,32(2) :192-203.
  • 4Cox D., Cox A. D. Communicating the Consequences of Early Detection: The Role of Evidence and Framing[ J J. Journal of Mar- keting, 2001,65(3) :91-103.
  • 5Peters E., Levin I. P. Dissecting the Risky-Choice Framing Effect: Numeracy as an Individual-Difference Factor in WeightingRisky and Riskless Options [ J ]. Judgment and Decision Making, 2008,3 (6) : 435-448.
  • 6Haerem T., Kuvaas B., Bakken B. T., et al. Do Military Decision Makers Behave as Predicted by Prospect Theory? [ J ]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2011,24 (5) : 482-497.
  • 7Marshall R., Huan T. C., Xu Y., et al. Extending Prospect Theory Cross-Culturally by Examining Switching Behavior in Consumer and Business-to-Business Contexts [ J ] Journal of Business Research, 201 I, 64 (8) : 871-878.
  • 8Luo L., Chen X. J., Han J., et al. Dilution and Enhancement of Celebrity Brands through Sequential Movie Releases [ J ]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2010,47 (6) : 1114-1 128.
  • 9Tversky A., Kahneman D. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice[ J]. Science, 1981,211(4481) :453-458.
  • 10Kuhberger A. The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-Analysis[ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1998,75 ( 1 ) : 23-55.

二级参考文献247

共引文献229

同被引文献117

  • 1张银玲,苗丹民,罗正学,刘旭峰,齐建林.正负信息框架下人格特征对决策的影响作用[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(4):363-366. 被引量:23
  • 2张红涛,王二平.态度与行为关系研究现状及发展趋势[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):163-168. 被引量:147
  • 3彭聃龄.普通心理学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2004.357-8.
  • 4派恩B约瑟夫,吉尔摩詹姆斯.H,体验经济[M].毕崇毅,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2012:93.
  • 5Da Silveira G, Borenstein D, Fogliatto, F S. Mass customization: Literature review and research directions[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2001, 72(1): 1-13.
  • 6Goldstein D G, Eric J J, Andreas H, et al. Nudge your customers toward better choices [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2008, 86 (12): 99-105.
  • 7Simon H A. A behavioral model of rational choice [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1995, 69(4): 99-118.
  • 8Park C W, Jun S Y, Macinnis D J. Choosing what I want versus rejecting what 1 do not want: An application of decision framing to product option choice decisions [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2000, 37(4): 187-202.
  • 9Larrick R P, Soil J B. The MPG illusion [J]. Science, 2008, 320 (6): 1593-1594.
  • 10Putrevu S. An examination of consumer responses toward attribute-and goal-framed messages [J]. Journal of Advertising, 2010, 39(3): 5-24.

引证文献8

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部