是物质一元论,还是实践一元论——析实践观点首要论、实践观点核心论的实质

Materialistic Monism or Practical Monism

我国哲学界关于实践唯物主义和如何表述马克思主义哲学的讨论,要害是实践与唯物主义何者居首要地位,实质是坚持物质一元论还是搞实践一元论的问题。一些持实践唯物主义观点的学者提出的实践观点首要论、实践观点核心论,否定了思维与存在的关系问题是哲学的基本问题,背离了马克思主义哲学的唯物主义本质;无视实践观点有唯物主义与唯心主义之分;从根本上背离了科学的实践观;无法与实用主义的实践核心论划清界限;与马克思主义的实事求是思想不相容;曲解了列宁关于认识论中的实践标准的论述。其实质是否定物质一元论,宣扬实践一元论。只有以辩证唯物主义为指导,才能正确理解马克思的《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》。否定或贬低辩证唯物主义,就是从根本上背离马克思主义哲学。

The crucial point of Chinese scholar＇s discussion on practical materialism and how to present Marxist philosophy is that practice and materialism is primacy, namely, in essence, sticking to materialistic monism or changing to practical monism. Those scholars who see practice as the foremost and core point of Marxist philosophy deny the proposition that the relationship between thinking and being is the basic question of philosophy, bend them from the materialist nature of Marxist philosophy and overlook the difference between materialist view of practice and idealist view. At the same time, they also veer radically from the scientific concept of practice and can＇ t sever from pragmatist view of practice. What＇ s more, their views are incompatible with Marxist thought of seeking truth from the facts, misinterpret practical criterion of Lenin epistemology and in essence, deny materialistic monism and advocate practical monism. Only with dialectical materialism as a guidance can Marx＇s Theses on Feuerbach be understand properly. In a word, denying or disparaging dialectical materialism is a fundamental departure from the Marxist philosophy.