期刊文献+

论自甘冒险抗辩在过失体育伤害归责中的有限保留 被引量:3

The Limited Reserves for the Defense of Risk Assumption in Negligent Sports Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过有效的抗辩来免除或限制体育领域过失责任的承担,对于体育活动的正常开展和维持体育竞技的活力非常重要。一般认为,自甘冒险是体育伤害过失较为常见的抗辩事由。随着传统的自甘冒险抗辩在现代英美判例法实践中丧失其独立性,明示的自甘冒险和次要的默示自甘冒险也逐渐退出体育领域,但在以Knight案为典型的一批判例中,主要的默示自甘冒险却得以在体育领域保留和延续下来,并在此基础上派生出固有风险理论等。 Excluding or limiting the negligent liability in sports through the effective defense is significant for maintaining the vitality of sports. It is generally believed that risk assumption is a usual defense for negligence in sports injuries. As the traditional defense referring to risk assumption lost its independence in the modern Anglo-American case law practice, express risk assumption and secondary implied risk assumption also have faded out in sports area. However, in some cases, typically as Knight v. Jewett, primary implied risk assumption has continued to be applied in this area, and developed some derivative theory, including inherent risk.
作者 李倩 邓春岳
出处 《湖南警察学院学报》 2013年第6期69-74,共6页 Journal of Hunan Police Academy
基金 教育部人文社科项目"奥运会与国际体育争端解决机制研究"(07JZD0015)
关键词 过失 体育伤害 自甘冒险 negligence sports injury risk assumption
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Nelson v. Hall, (1985)165 Cal.App.3d 709.
  • 2周晓晨.论受害人“自甘冒险”在我国侵权责任法上的意义[EB/0L]. http://www.qinquanfa.com/Article/Article.aspx7Id =127,2012-1-12.
  • 3Walter T. ChampionJR., Sports Law in a Nutshell,Thomson/West, 2005,Walter T. ChampionJR., Sports Law ina Nutshell, Thomson/West, 2005,P83.
  • 4陈聪富.自甘冒险与运动伤害[A].台北大学法学论丛[C].2009,(73):143-184.
  • 5Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., (1929) 250 N.Y. 479.
  • 6Neinstein v. Los Angeles Dodgers, Inc.,(1986)185 Cal.App.3d 176.
  • 7Ordway v. Superior Court, supra, ( 1988 )198 Cal. App.3d102-105.
  • 8Rudnick v. Golden West Broadcasters, ( 1984)156 Cal.App.3d 793.
  • 9Stephen A. Thiele, SPORTS AND TORTS: INJURING AFELLOW PARTICIPANT CAN BE COSTLY, 23 Advoc. Q.2000.348.
  • 10Knight v. Jewett, (1992) 3 Cal. App. 4th 1022.

二级参考文献47

  • 1黄京平,陈鹏展.竞技行为正当化研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2004(6):27-36. 被引量:36
  • 2高晓.论自愿承担风险[J].福建政法管理干部学院学报,2005,7(4):91-94. 被引量:14
  • 3彭婕.受害人同意和风险自负在体育运动侵权领域的应用[J].广西政法管理干部学院学报,2007,22(2):100-104. 被引量:16
  • 4梁亚,李延生.自愿承受风险原则研究[J].河北法学,2007,25(3):186-190. 被引量:5
  • 5卢国利.析跆拳道运动自甘冒险和风险自负原则[EB/OL].法律快车网, http://www.lawtime.cn/article/ 111619425624519009073.
  • 6王千维.侵权行为损害赔偿责任法上之允诺.政大法学评论,2008,(102).
  • 7《中华人民共和国侵权责任法(草案)(二次审议稿)》[EB/OL].http://xingjun.fyfz.cn/blog/xingjun/index.aspx?blogid=446085.
  • 8Rita Hanscom,Assumption of Risk Defense in Sports or Recreation Injury Cases[Z].30 Am.Jut.at 7,2002.
  • 9Restatement of Torts (Second)[Z].1977:496A-496G.
  • 10Alexander J Drago.Assumption of Risk:An Age-Old Defense Still Viable in Sports and Recreation Cases[J].Prop Media&Ent,2002:583.

共引文献72

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部