期刊文献+

基于Gabor小波的TOFD图像缺陷识别研究 被引量:4

Defect recognition of TOFD image based on Gabor wavelet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对运用超声衍射时差法(TOFD)法对焊缝进行检测时,图像缺陷人工定性主要受检验人员经验和专业知识影响缺乏可靠性的问题,提出了一种TOFD图像缺陷自动定性的方法。该方法首先提取TOFD缺陷图像的Gabor小波特征,并依据这些特征,采用主成分分析技术(PCA)对Gabor特征进行降维,然后采用Fisher线性判别分析方法对其进行了判别分析,最后完成了缺陷的自动定性分析;同时,建立了一个实际系统,并在测试样本上进行了试验验证,试验在109幅人工试块缺陷及自然缺陷训练样本及25幅测试样本中进行,采用Gabor小波特征及原始图像像素特征所构建的缺陷分类器识别率比较。研究结果表明,基于Gabor小波特征的缺陷识别方法识别率达到72%,比原始图像特征的缺陷识别方法更优。 Aiming at the problems of time of flight diffraction (TOFD) method which credibility of defect recognition influenced by personnel's experience and professional knowledge,an automatic recognition approach was proposed for TOFD image defects.Firstly,the Gabor wavelet of TOFD defects image characteristics was extracted,to reduce the dimension Gabor features,the principal component analysis (PCA) technique has been used based on these characteristics.Then,the Fisher linear discriminant analysis method was used to analysis,at last,the actual system and the test sample on the test verification has been established for testing.Experiment in the 109 training samples and 25 test samples which comes from artificials and natural defects,compared Gabor wavelet features with characteristics of the original image pixel defect classifier recognition rate in test.The results indicate that the rate of recognition based on Gabor wavelet feature is 72%,it has higher rate of recognition than the method based on the original image pixel.
出处 《机电工程》 CAS 2013年第12期1450-1454,共5页 Journal of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering
基金 福建省质量技术监督局资助项目(FJQI2012028)
关键词 超声衍射时差法 GABOR小波 FISHER 线性判别分析 主成分分析技术 time of flight diffraction (TOFD) Gabor wavelet Fisher linear discriminant analysis principal component analysis(PCA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1KECHIDA A,DRAI R,GUESSOUM A.Texture analysis for flaw detection in ultrasonic images[J].Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation,2012,31 (2):108-116.
  • 2盛朝阳,刚铁,迟大钊.基于分水岭方法的超声TOFD检测图像分割[J].机械工程学报,2011,47(8):35-40. 被引量:25
  • 3林乃昌.基于变型波的超声TOFD近表面检测新方法[J].机电工程,2013,30(8):967-970. 被引量:8
  • 4KECHIDA A,DRAI R.BENAMMAR A.Image Processing and Wavelets Transform for Sizing of Weld Defects using Ultrasonic TOFD images[C].Acoustics 08 Paris:609-614.
  • 5MOURA E P,SILVA R R,SIQUEIRA M H S,et al.Pattern recognition of weld defects in preprocessed tofd signals using linear classifiers[J].Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation,2004,23(4):163-172.
  • 6SHITOLE C N,ZAHRAN O,AL-NUAIMY W.Combining fuzzy logic and neural networks in classification of weld defects using ultrasonic time-of-flight diffraction[J].Insight,2007 (49):79-82.
  • 7彭伟,卢超,徐薇.超声TOFD检测回波信号的时间识别[J].无损探伤,2008,32(6):5-8. 被引量:2
  • 8LEE T S.Image representation using 2d gabor wavelets[J].IEEE Trans.Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,1996,18(10):959-971.
  • 9WISKOTT L,FELLOUS J,KRUGER N,et al.Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching[J].IEEE Trans.PAMI,1997,19(7):775-669.

二级参考文献27

  • 1强天鹏,肖雄,李智军,郑振顺,江运喜.TOFD技术的检测盲区计算和分析[J].无损检测,2008,30(10):738-740. 被引量:43
  • 2王军伟,阙沛文.分离谱法在超声信号处理中的应用[J].计算机测量与控制,2004,12(7):670-671. 被引量:4
  • 3杨克己.基于神经网络的自适应滤波技术及其在超声检测中的应用[J].仪器仪表学报,2005,26(8):813-817. 被引量:19
  • 4迟大钊,刚铁,高双胜.Background removal and weld defect detection based on energy distribution of image[J].China Welding,2007,16(1):14-18. 被引量:13
  • 5Honarvar F,Sherkhzadeh H, Moles M. Improving the time resolution and signal to noise ratio of ultrasonic NDE signals[J]. Ultrasonics ,2004,41: 755-763.
  • 6Huang N E, Shen Zheng ,Long S R, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis [J]. Proc. R. Soc. Lond(A) ,1998,454(1) : 903-955.
  • 7Loutridis S J. Damage detection in gear systems using empirical mode decomposition [J]. Engineering Structures, 2004,26(12) : 1833-1841.
  • 8Bennett, Michael. Empirical mode decomposition and tissue harmonic imaging[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biololgy, 2005,31(8):1051-1061.
  • 9BABY S, BALASUBRAMANIAN T, PARDIKAR R J. Estimation of the height of surface-breaking cracks using ultrasonic timing methods[C]//The 6th International Conference of Slovenian Society for Nondestructive Testing, Sept. 13-15, 2001, Portoroz, Slovenia, 2001: 63-72.
  • 10BABY S, BALASUBRAMANIAN T, PARDIKAR R J, et al. Time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique for accurate sizing of surface-breaking cracks[J]. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2003, 45(6) 426-430.

共引文献29

同被引文献37

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部