摘要
虽然在加拿大经历了漫长的"非法移民遣返程序",但是高山最终是被"劝返"回国的。高山案和赖昌星案有诸多相似之处,但两人出逃时的身份、在加拿大的诉讼程序以及回国的方式都不相同。从高山案反思我国的境外追逃工作,可以看到高山回国是多种因素作用的结果,也反映出我国国际刑事司法合作正日趋完善,但仍需要进一步开拓我国与西方发达国家的国际刑事司法合作新领域。
Although GAO Shan experienced immigration repatriation process in Canada for a long period,he was finally persuaded to return to China. GAO Shan Case and LAI Chang-xing Case have some similarities,but there were many differences existed between the two cases,such as,statuses in running away,suing procedures in Canada,and the ways of returning China,etc. We found out that there were many factors contributing to GAO Shan's return,which showing that China's international cooperation in criminal justice is growing,but we still should open up new areas of extradition,to strengthen the international criminal judicial cooperation with western developed countries.
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第1期87-94,174,共8页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金
北京市2013年哲学社会科学规划项目
北京高等学校"青年英才计划"项目(YETP0293)
关键词
高山案
非法移民遣返
劝返
赖昌星案
境外追逃
GAO Shan Case
immigration repatriation
persuade to return
LAI Chang-xing Case
overseas pursuit
