期刊文献+

垂丝海棠抗氧化活性的研究 被引量:4

Study on antioxidant activity of Malus halliana Koehne
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用清除二苯代苦味酰基(DPPH)自由基、清除[2,2'-连氨-(3-乙基苯并噻唑啉-6-磺酸)二氨盐](ABTS)自由基及铁离子还原/抗氧化能力(FRAP)测定法对不同采摘月份垂丝海棠花和叶进行体外抗氧化活性评价,并与阳性对照二丁基羟基甲苯(BHT)进行比较。结果表明:在垂丝海棠12个提取物中,3月叶正丁醇部位清除DPPH自由基及还原Fe3+(IC50=35.80μg/mL,TEAC=869.73μmol/g)最强,弱于阳性对照BHT(IC50=23.00μg/mL,TEAC=1532.70μmol/g);3月叶乙酸乙酯提取物清除ABTS自由基(IC50=3.50μg/mL)能力最强,弱于阳性对照BHT(IC50=2.30μg/mL)。实验表明垂丝海棠3月采集的叶抗氧化活性总体好于7月叶,并且叶的活性强于花。 To study the antioxidant activity of flowers and leaves of Malus halliarm Koehne harvested in different months, 1 -diphenyl-2 -picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging, [ 2,2'-azino-bis ( 3-ethylbenzothiazoline ) -6 -sulphonic acid ] diamonium salt (ABTS) radical scavenging and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay were applied with BHT as positive control. Among twelve extracts of the leaves and flowers of M. halliana,the results showed that the n-butanol extract from March leaves had the best DPPH radical scavenging activity (IC5o = 35.80 μg/mL) and ferric reducing an- tioxidant power (TEAC = 869.73 μmol/g), which were still weaker than that of the positive control BHT ( IC50 = 23.00μg/mL and TEAC = 1532.70μmol/g respectively). The ethyl acetate extract of leaves collected in March exhibited the highest free radical scavenging activity (IC50 =3.50 μg/mL) ,but it was still inferior to positive control BHT (IC50 = 2.30 txg/mL). It demonstrated that antioxidant activity of M. ha/I/arm was weak. The extract of leaves harvested in March had better activities than that of leaves harvested in July, and the antioxidant activities of extract of leaves were higher than that of flowers.
出处 《天然产物研究与开发》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第12期1748-1751,共4页 Natural Product Research and Development
基金 河南省科技厅重点攻关项目(102102310019 122102310170) 河南省教育厅科学技术研究重点项目(14B360011) 郑州市科技攻关项目(20131015) 河南省青年骨干教师计划(2012-704)
关键词 垂丝海棠 抗氧化活性 DPPH ABTS FRAP Malus ht,tliana Koehne antioxidant activity DPPH ABTS FRAP
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献62

共引文献69

同被引文献57

  • 1崔彦,束怀瑞.红色苹果花青苷的组成[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2000,31(3):309-310. 被引量:10
  • 2蔡定建,谢志鹏,罗六保,张磊.脐橙皮中黄酮类化合物与果胶的分离和提取研究[J].分析测试技术与仪器,2006,12(4):239-242. 被引量:12
  • 3汪葵,叶晓燕.脐橙皮再利用研究[J].天津化工,2007,21(4):40-42. 被引量:16
  • 4方积年,丁侃.天然药物——多糖的主要生物活性及分离纯化方法[J].中国天然药物,2007,5(5):338-347. 被引量:146
  • 5Karaman S,Tutem E,Baskan K S,et al. Comparison of total antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of some apple juices with combined HPLC-CUPRAC assay[J]. Food Chemistry, 2010, 120(4): 1201-1209.
  • 6Drogoudi P D, Michailidis Z, Pantelidis G. Peel and flesh antioxidant content and harvest quality characteristics of seven apple cultivars [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2008,115 (2) : 149 - 153.
  • 7Wang H,Cao G,Prior R L. The oxygen radical absorbing capacity of anthocyanins[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1997,45(2) : 304-309.
  • 8Clifford M N. Anthocyanins nature,oceurrenee and dietary burden[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2000, 80(7) : 1063-1072.
  • 9Konczak I,Zhang W. Anthocyanins-more than nature's colors [J]. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology,2004,2004 (5): 239-240.
  • 10Li H H, Flachowsky H, Fischer T C, et al. Maize Lc transcription factor enhances biosynthesis of anthocyanins, distinct proanthocyanidins and phenylpropanoids in apple(Malus domestica Borkh. ) [J]. Planta, 2007,226( 5 ) : 1243-1254.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部