期刊文献+

北京新机场跑道构型设计方案比较 被引量:2

Runway Layout Comparison of Beijing New Airport
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为满足北京地区快速增长的旅客航空需求,开展北京新机场建设工作.本期规划机场跑道数量4条,有"3+1"和"4+0"两种跑道构型备选方案.首先从机场、空管和航空公司三个角度定性分析,确定跑道构型方案比较的评价指标,分别是跑道容量、地面滑行时间和航班延误,再采用数学方法计算两种方案下跑道的理论容量,最后用Simmod软件对两种方案进行仿真分析.根据评价指标比较仿真结果,可知"3+1"跑道构型方案较优.同时该结果也可以作为北京新机场跑道构型设计方案比选等相关问题研究的参考. The Beijing new airport project is developed to satisfy the aviation demand of Beijing area. There are 4 runways in the new airport, as well as two alternative programs in the present period, which are called “3+1” and “4+0” to differentiate. Through macro analysis from airport administration, air traffic control and airlines, the evaluation system for choices of alternative program is established, which includes runway capacity, ground taxing time and delays. Then, the theory runway capacity is estimated. After the analysis of these, this paper builds the separate model based on the Simmod software. The “3+1” program is a better option based on the simulating models and the evaluation system. Besides, the conclusion could give theoretical reference to research for the runway layout comparison of Beijing new airport.
作者 王涛波 高伟
出处 《计算机系统应用》 2014年第1期93-97,共5页 Computer Systems & Applications
关键词 跑道构型 跑道容量 滑行时间 航班延误 runway layout runway capacity taxing time delay
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献28

  • 1陈勇,曹义华,周勇.北京首都国际机场容量评估研究[J].飞行力学,2005,23(4):86-89. 被引量:6
  • 2理查德·德·纽弗威尔,阿米第R·欧都尼.机场系统:规划、设计和管理[M].北京:中国民航出版社,2006.
  • 3Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Design, Advisory Circular AC 150/5300-13[R]. Washington: Federal Aviation Administration, 2008.
  • 4MILAN JANIC. A Modal of the Ultimate Capacity of Dual Dependent Parallel Runways[R]. Delft: OTB Research Institute Technical University of Delft, 2006.
  • 5上海机场(集团)有限公司.浦东机场需求预测与资源分配计划报告[R].上海:上海机场(集团)有限公司,2008.
  • 6GILBO E P. Airport capacity: representation, estimation, optimiza- tion [ J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 1993, 1(3): 144-154.
  • 7NEUFVILLE R D, ODONI A R. Airport systems planning, de- signs, and management[M]. New York: MeGraw-HiU, 2002.
  • 8WANG CHAO, ZHANG XINYUE, XU XIAOHAO. Simulation study on airfield system capacity analysis using SIMMOD[ C]// 2008 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2008: 87-90.
  • 9GAO WEI, JIANG SIYUAN. Simulation study on closely spaced parallel runway analysis using SIMMOD plus[ C]// Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Computation Tech- nology and Automation. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2010: 344- 347.
  • 10HUANG A S, SCI-ILEICHER D, HUNTER G. Future flight de- mand generation tool[ C]// Proceedings of AIAA the 4th Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations (ATIO) Forum. Chicago: AIAA, 2004: 6400.

共引文献42

同被引文献11

  • 1都业富,朱新华,冯敏.DEA方法在中国民用机场评价中的应用研究[J].中国民航学院学报,2006,24(6):46-49. 被引量:21
  • 2张越,胡华清.基于Malmquist生产力指数的我国民用机场运营效率分析[J].系统工程,2006,24(12):40-45. 被引量:32
  • 3谈至明,赵鸿铎,张兰芳.机场规划与设计[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2009.
  • 4Gillen D, Lall A. Developing measures of airport productivity and performance: an application of data envelopment analysis[J]. Transportation Research PartE: Logistics and Transportation Review, 1997, 33(4): 261-273.
  • 5Martin J C, Roman C. An application of DEA to measure the efficiency of Spanish airports prior to privatization[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2001(3): 149-157.
  • 6Fernandes E, Pacheco R R. Efficient use of airport capacity[J]. Transportation research part A: Policy and practice, 2002(3): 225-238.
  • 7Bazargan M, Vasigh B. Size versus efficiency: a case study of US commercial airports[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2003, 9(3): 187-193.
  • 8魏松龄.评价相对有效的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.
  • 9罗伯特·霍隆杰夫,弗朗西斯·马卡维.机场规划与设计[M].吴问涛译.北京:中国民航机场建设工程公司译印,1983:161.
  • 10刘艳春,赵一,胡微娜,孙博文.基于超效率数据包络分析模型的海外并购绩效--金融危机后的行业数据检验[J].经济与管理研究,2013(3):61-66. 被引量:6

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部