偶然防卫不可罚说存在的疑问

Deficiencies of the Theory of Impunity on Accidental Defence

偶然防卫的案件在实践中比较罕见,但是该问题对于区别学者在结果无价值论与行为无价值论之争问题上的基本立场具有试金石的作用。随着结果无价值论的影响在我国不断扩大,偶然防卫不可罚说逐渐有力。但是不可罚说在偶然防卫的概念、论证思路等问题上存在疑问,且在具体案件当中,贯彻不可罚说可能会得出不合理的结论。因此,采取未遂说,在极其特殊的场合肯定偶然防卫的不可罚性是比较稳妥的结论。

Cases of accidental defence are quite rare, but accidental defence is the key to distinguish scholars＇ debates on Erfolsunwert theory and Handlungsunwert theory. With the expansion of Erfolsunwert theory in our country, an increasingly number of scholars begins to stand for the theory of impunity. However, the impunity theory has a lot of deficiencies on the concept and demonstration of accidental defenee. The implement of the impunity theory in concrete cases might reach irrational conclusionas. Therefore, adopting the theory of attempted crime and approving the theory of impunity on accidental defence just on extremely special occasions should be a reasonable choice.