期刊文献+

基于德摩根展开与边界条件的事件树分析 被引量:2

Event Tree Analysis Based on Demorgan and Boundary Condition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大型复杂系统的事件树分析通常采用大链接方法,即将需要分析的事件树题头包含的安全功能系统的故障树模型合并转换为一棵规模较大的非单调关联故障树,然后再对其进行分析。该方法需消耗大量计算资源和时间。本文提出了一种基于德摩根展开与边界条件的事件树序列/后果故障树的建造方法,它根据分析人员的设置对每个事件树题头的成功分支进行不同精度的近似处理,以在满足工程需求的基础上提高计算速度。将该方法应用于FDS团队自主研发的概率安全/可靠性分析软件RiskA,并采用多个国际标准例题进行了正确性验证。 In the event tree analysis of large complex system, the fault tree model of correlative safety systems will be generally put together as a large non-coherent fault tree to be analyzed. This is known as the normal fault tree link method that needs vast computer resource and calculation time. A fault tree construction method for event tree sequence and consequence was developed based on Demorgan and boundary conditions. In the light of the different treatments of every function event in the event tree of this method, the calculation can be finished fast as much as possible while fulfill the demand of analysis. Coding of the event tree analysis module of RiskA, which was an integrated reliability and probabilistic safety analysis program developed by FDS Team, was finished and several practical cases were tested to prove its validity.
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第B12期536-540,共5页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(WK2140000003) 中国科学院合肥物质科学研究院院长基金资助(YZJJ201327)
关键词 概率安全分析 事件树分析 功能事件 成功分支 RiskA probabilistic safety analysis event tree analysis function event successful branch RiskA
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1SALEH J H, MARAIS K B, BAKOLAS E, et al. Highlights from the literature on accident causation and system safety: Review of major ideas, recent contributions, and challenges[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010, 95(11): 1 105-1 116.
  • 2RUEDA A, PAWLAK M. Pioneers of the relia- bility theories of the past 50 years[C]//2004 An- nual Symposium-RAMS: Reliability and Main- tainability. USA: IEEE, 2004: 102-109.
  • 3KIYOTO Aizawa, NAKAI Ryodai. Living PSA program: LIPSAS development for safety man- agement of an LMFBR plant[J]. Reliability En- gineering & System Safety, 1994, 44(3) : 325- 334.
  • 4JUNG W S, KIM D K. FORTE: A fast new al gorithm for risk monitors and PSA[M]//Proba- bilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Godalming, Britain.. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 1998.
  • 5VAURIO J K. Ideas and developments in impor- tance measures and fault-tree techniques for relia- bility and risk analysis[J]. Reliability Engineer- ing & System Safety, 2010, 95(2): 99-107.
  • 6HONG E S, LEE I M, SHIN H S, et al. Quan- titative risk evaluation based on event tree analy- sis technique: Application to the design of shield TBM[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2009, 24(3): 269-277.
  • 7吴宜灿,刘萍,胡丽琴,张士杰,王海涛,李亚洲,聂淼,麻晓敏,袁润,李媛媛,汪建业,王世鹏,陈海燕.大型集成概率安全分析软件系统的研究与发展[J].核科学与工程,2007,27(3):270-276. 被引量:35
  • 8殷园,汪进,陈珊琦,王芳,王家群.概率安全分析软件RiskA与RiskSpectrum的故障树计算引擎计算对比分析研究[J].核科学与工程,2014,34(2):285-288. 被引量:3
  • 9李亚洲,胡丽琴,袁润,吴宜灿.概率安全评价软件RiskA中的非逻辑处理方法[J].原子能科学技术,2010,44(8):969-973. 被引量:8
  • 10王海涛,吴宜灿,丁厚本,刘萍,胡丽琴,张士杰,李亚洲.核电厂PSA中事故序列后果分析方法研究[J].原子能科学技术,2008,42(8):724-728. 被引量:2

二级参考文献89

共引文献54

同被引文献35

  • 1黄晓英,张剑芳.层次分析法在仓库安全评价中的应用[J].商品储运与养护,2004,26(3):40-42. 被引量:18
  • 2马亚龙,邵秋峰,孙明,等.评估理论和方法及其军事应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,2013.
  • 3陈兆东.论仓库安全工程建设[J].城市建设理论研究,2011(36):3-5.
  • 4陶敏,王辉文,凌艳.空军后方军械仓库安全管理风险评估[J].空军勤务学院学报,2013,24(3):67-70.
  • 5任风云.航空弹药勤务[M].徐州:徐州空军学院,2008:11-35.
  • 6Andrews J D, Dunnett S J. Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2000, 49(2): 230-238.
  • 7Nusbaumer O, Rauzy A. Fault tree linking versus event tree linking approaches: a mathematical and algorithmic reconciliation[C], llth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, 2012.
  • 8Epstein S, Rauzy A. Can we trust PRA[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2005, 88(3): 195-205.
  • 9Wu Y, FDS Team. Development of reliability and probabilistic safety assessment program RiskA[J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2015, 83:316-321.
  • 10Wu Y C, FDS Team. CAD-based interface programs for fusion neutron transport simulation[J]. Fusion Engineering and Design, 2009, 84(7-11): 1987-1992.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部