期刊文献+

形成性评估在基本生命支持技能培训中的应用和思考 被引量:1

Application of formative assessment in basic life support education and its reflection
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察形成性评估对医学生学习基本生命支持(basic life support,BLS)技能的影响。方法206名医学生随机分入对照组(c组,100人)与试验组(F组,106人)。BLS理论课后,C组接受45min技能培训,培训结束后接受BLS技能评估(培训后评估)。而F组在培训前先接受BLS技能评估(一种形成性评估);之后,依据其在培训前评估中的操作给予15rain反馈,随后进行30minBLS技能培训。培训结束后F组再次接受BLS技能评估。两组培训后技能评估平均成绩采用Student’S—t—test进行比较,P〈0.05表示差异有统计学意义。结果培训后评估中F组成绩(85.2±7.3)分优于C组(68.2±13.2)分,差异有统计学意义(P=0.00)。结论形成性评估可以显著提高医学生BLS技能培训成绩。 Objective To investigate the effect of formative assessment on skill acquisition of basic life support (BLS) among medical students. Methods Totally 206 undergraduates were ran- domized into control group (C group) and interventional group (F group). A BLS lecture was given in both groups. And then, 45 min BLS training and BLS skill assessment (after training) were given in C group. Undergraduates in F group received BLS skill assessment (formative assessment) before training, and 15 min feedback was delivered based on the assessment, then 30 rain BLS training was conducted. Skills assessment was conducted again in F group after the training. Student's-t-test was used to compare the difference of skills between the two groups and P〈0.05 signifies statistically sig- nificant differences. Results Score of F group (85.2±7.3) were higher than that in C group (68.2 ± 13.2), with statistical difference. Conclusion A formative assessment could significantly improve skill acquisition of BLS among medical students.
出处 《中华医学教育探索杂志》 2013年第11期1088-1091,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
关键词 基本生命支持 模拟教学 形成性评估 Basic life support Simulation-based medical education Formative assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee,Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J].Circulation,2005,(24):1-203.
  • 2李崎,林静,刘进,马尔丽,粱鹏,方利群,石庭伟,罗朝志.集体反馈方法对医学生基本生命支持技能学习的影响[J].中华医学教育杂志,2012,32(6):909-911. 被引量:8
  • 3李崎,罗朝志,刘进,林静,卿平,夏天.临床教学中基本生命支持技能评估制度的建立[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2011,10(6):711-713. 被引量:4
  • 4李崎,林静,刘进,马尔丽,梁鹏,罗朝志,卿平.医学生基本生命支持教学中技能评估方法的探讨[J].中国高等医学教育,2012(4):63-64. 被引量:3
  • 5Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education[J].New England Journal of Medicine,2007,(356):387-396.
  • 6Schmidt RA,Lee TD. Motor control and learning:a behavioural emphasis[M].Champaign:Human Kinetics Publishers Inc,1999.
  • 7Sweller J,van Merrie¨nboer JJG,Paas F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design[J].Educational Psychology Review,1998,(10):251-296.
  • 8Xeroulis GJ,Park J,Moulton CA. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students:a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback[J].Surgery,2007,(141):442-449.doi:10.1016/j.surg.2006.09.012.
  • 9Salmoni AW,Schmidt RA,Walter CB. Knowledge of results and motor learning:a review and critical reappraisal[J].Psychological Bulletin,1984,(95):355-386.
  • 10Schmidt RA,Wulf G. Continuous concurrent feedback degrades skill learning:implications for training and simulation[J].Hum Fac-tors,1997,(39):509-525.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, et al. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach,2005, (27) :10-28.
  • 2ECC Committee. Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation,2005,112(2g Suppl) :IV1-203.
  • 3Xeroulis GJ, Park J, Moulton CA, et al. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: A randomized controlled tudy comparing computer-based video instruction and ( concurrent and summary) expert feedback. Surgery ,2007 (141) :442-449.
  • 4Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA, 1983 ( 250 ) : 777 -781.
  • 5Schmidt RA, Lee TD, eds. Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioural Emphasis. 3 ra ed, Champaign, Ill: Human Kinetics, 1999.
  • 6Sweller J, van Merrinboer J J, Paas F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev, 1998, ( 10 ) :251-296.
  • 7ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonay Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care[J].Circulation,2005,(24 Suppl):IVI-203.
  • 8Martin JA,Regehr G,Remick R,MacRae H Mumaghan J Hutchison C Brown M. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents[J].British Journal of Surgery,1997.273-278.
  • 9Berg RA,Hemphill R,Abella BS,Aufderheide TP etc 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science. Part 5:Adult Basic Life Support[J].Circulation,2010.S685-S705.
  • 10Murray DJ. Chinical simulation technical novelty or innovation in education[J].Anesthesiology,1998.1.doi:10.1097/00000542-199807000-00002.

共引文献10

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部