期刊文献+

髋臼假体角度与全髋关节置换术后脱位的关系 被引量:12

Effect of orientation of cup on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究人工全髋关节置换术(THA)髋臼假体安装固定角度与术后髋关节脱位的关系。方法在X线片测量236例(248髋)THA术后的髋臼外展角和前倾角,将外展角设定为〈30°、30-50°、〉50°3组,前倾角设定为〈0°、0-25°、〉25°3组。分析以上2个因素与术后髋关节脱位的关系。结果脱位组外展角平均(39±11.88)°,非脱位组为(38.98±8.65)°,两组之间外展角差异无统计学意义(P=0.449);脱位组前倾角平均(12.33±14.89)°,非脱位组为(13.21±11.52)°,两组之间前倾角差异无统计学意义(P=0.131)°外展角在〈30°、30-50°、〉50°不同范围的脱位率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),前倾角在〈0°、0~25°、〉25°不同范围内的脱位率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论髋臼假体外展角在14~58°范围内、前倾角在-15~350范围内与THA术后脱位之间不存在相关性。 Objective To study the effect of orientation of the cup on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA) which could be used as a basis to evaluate clinical practice. Methods Of whom 236 patients(248 hips) met the selected criteria and were evaluated in this study. The standardized anteroposterior radiographs of the hip and the cross-table lateral film of the hip were used for measuring of the abduction angle and the anteversion angle. The abduction angle was further classified as normal, if it was 30-50°; horizontal, if it was less than 30°; and vertical, if it was greater than 50°. The anteversion angle was also further classified as being anteverted (〉25°), neutral (0-25°), retroverted (〈0°). Results In the patients who had a dislocation, the average acetabular component abduction angle was (39.00±11.88)°, whereas the average abduction angle for the other patients who did not dislocate was (38.98.00±8.65)°(P =0.449). And the patients who had a dislocation, the average anteversion angle was (12.33±14.89)°, whereas the average anteversion angle for the patients who did not dislocate was (13.21 ±11.52)°(P =0.131). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of dislocation between patients who were categorized as having a normal abduction angle(30-50°) and patients who had a vertical or horizontal angle(P 〉0.05); And there also no significant difference between the anteversion angle(P 〉0.05). Conclusion The aeetabular abduction angle from 14° to 58°and antevertion angle from -15°to 35°have no effect on dislocation after THA.
出处 《中国骨与关节损伤杂志》 2013年第12期1119-1121,共3页 Chinese Journal of Bone and Joint Injury
关键词 人工全髋关节置换术 髋臼 前倾角 外展角 脱位 Total hip arthroplasty Acetabulum Anteversion angle Abduction angle Dislocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Moskal Jr, Capps SG, Scanelli JA. Improving the accuracy of acetab- ular component orientation :avoiding malposifioning: AAOS exhibit selection[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2013,95(11) :e761-710.
  • 2纪泉,文良元,路奎元.全髋关节置换术后脱位的研究进展[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,18(10):718-720. 被引量:4
  • 3McCollum DE,Gray WJ. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: causes and prevention[J]. Clin Orthop, 1990,261:159-170.
  • 4Biedennann R,Tonin A,Krismer M,et al. Reducing the risk of dis- location after total hip arthroplasty:the effect of orientation of the acetabular component[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2005,87:762-769.
  • 5Lewinnek GE,Lewis JL,Tarr R,et al. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasties[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1978,60:217-220.
  • 6Von Knoch M,Berry DJ,Harmsen WS,et al. Late dislocation after to- tal hip arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2002,84:1949-1953.
  • 7Pierchon F,Pasquier G,Cotten A,et al. Causes of dislocation of total hip arthroplasty:CT study of component alignment [j]. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1994,76:45-48.
  • 8Woolsan ST,Rahimtoola ZO. Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replacement [j]. J Anhreplasty, 1999,14: 662-668.
  • 9Minoda Y, Kadowaki T, Kim M. Acetabular component orientation in 834 total hip arthroplasties using a manual technique[j]. Clin Orthop Relat Res .2006,445 : 186-191.
  • 10Komeno M,Hasegawa M,Sudo A,et al. Computed tomographic e- valuation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedlcs,2006,29 : 1104.

二级参考文献22

  • 1White RE Jr, Fomess TJ, AUman JK, et al. Effect of posterior capsular repair on early dislocation in primary total hip replacement.Clin Orthop, 2001, 393:163.
  • 2Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1982, 64:1295.
  • 3Demos HA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB, et al. Instability in primary total hip arthroplasty with the direct lateral approach. Clin Orthop,2001, 393:168.
  • 4Callaghan J J, Heithoff BE, Goetz DD, et al. Prevention of dislocation after hip arthroplasty: lessons from long - term followup. Clin Orthop, 2001, 393:157.
  • 5Woolson ST, Rahimtoola ZO. Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty,1999, 14 (6): 662.
  • 6Sioen W, Simon JP, Labey L, et al. Posterior transosseous capsulotendinous repair in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2002, 84:1793.
  • 7Gioe TJ. Dislocation following revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop, 2002, 31 (4): 225.
  • 8Ritter MA, Harty LD, KeatingME, etal. A clinical comparison of the anterolateral and posterolateral approaches to the hip. Clin Orthop, 2001, 385:95.
  • 9PeUicci PM, Bostrom M, Poss R. Posterior approach to total hip replacement using enhanced posterior soft tissue repair. Clin Orthop,1998, 355: 224.
  • 10Creighton MG, Callaghen J J, Olejniczak JP, et al. Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis.A minimum ten - year follow- up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1998, 80 (10): 1439.

共引文献3

同被引文献153

引证文献12

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部