期刊文献+

细毛羊放牧春秋季采食量的差异研究 被引量:5

The Feed Intake Differences of Fine- wool Sheep Grazing in Spring and Autumn
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】采食量的高低是影响放牧家畜生产性能的一个重要因素。【方法】试验以放牧条件下的新疆细毛羊为研究对象,分别测定春、秋季节的牧草营养成分,用全收粪法和外源指示剂法测定绵羊采食量,比较不同季节和不同方法的差异。【结果】用全收粪法测得春、秋两季的排粪量分别为(843.15±0.17)(g·d)和(1 147.81±0.14)(g·d),用外源指示剂测定的分别为(807.39±0.28)g·d和(1 090.42±0.23)g·d,两种方法差异不显著(P>0.05)。春季和秋季绵羊的放牧采食量分别为(1 391.57±230.40)g/d-1和(2 107.62±170.42)g/d-1,两季间差异极显著(P<0.01);牧草干物质消化率分别为(39.41±0.16)%、(45.54±0.01)%,两季间差异极显著(P<0.01)。【结论】用全收粪法和外源指示剂法测得的放牧绵羊排粪量差异不显著,可以用外源指示剂法代替全收粪法测定放牧绵羊的排粪量。不同季节牧草营养成分和采食量差异极显著。 [Objective] The level of feed intake is an important factor that affects the performance of grazing livestock production.[Method] Xinjiang fine-wool sheep grazing conditions were taken as the test subjects to measure spring and autumn forage nutrients,and the total feces collection method and foreign aid indicator method were applied to measure the sheep feed intake in order to compare differences between different seasons and different methods.[Result] The total feces collection method measured the defecation in spring and autumn were 843.15 ±0.17 and 1 147.81 ±0.14 g · d,foreign aid indicator measurement were 807.39 ±0.28 and 1 090.42 ±0.23 g · d,the difference was not significant (P 〉0.05).391.57 ± 230.40 and 2 107.62 ± 170.42 (g/d-1) in spring and autumn sheep grazing feed intake were highly significant (P 〈0.01),the difference between the two quarters; forage dry matter digestibility was(39.41 ±0.16)% and (45.54 ± 0.01)%,the difference between the two quarters was extremely significant (P 〈 0.01).[Conclusion] The difference of the fecal output of grazing sheep measured by total feces collection method and foreign aid indicator method was not significant,and foreign aid indicator method could replace the total feces collection method to measure the sheep fecal output.There is a great difference between different seasons forage nutrients and feed intake.
出处 《新疆农业科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第7期1340-1346,共7页 Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences
基金 公益性行业(农业)科研专项"新疆牧区家庭牧场资源优化配置技术模式试验与示范"(201003019) 国家绒毛用羊产业技术体系放牧草地生态岗位项目(CARS-40-09B)
关键词 采食量 消化率 排粪量 feed intake the digestibility defecating amount
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献20

  • 1王洪荣.影响我国放牧绵羊生产性能营养因素的探讨[J].畜牧与饲料科学,1997,22(S1):120-123. 被引量:2
  • 2王洪荣,冯宗慈,卢德勋,任家琨,李恒荣,DWPeter,JLindsay,DBPurser.天然牧草营养价值的季节性动态变化对放牧绵羊采食量和生产性能的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学,1997,22(S1):143-150. 被引量:14
  • 3汪诗平.几种草食动物日粮植物组成研究技术和方法的比较[J].草业学报,1995,4(3):8-16. 被引量:15
  • 4吴天星,杨诗兴,彭大惠.食道瘘管体外消化和Cr_2O_3三合一法测定放牧采食量[J].浙江农业大学学报,1995,21(3):239-242. 被引量:12
  • 5[3]Combs D K,Kellaway R C & Satter L D.1983 .Distribution of La,Yb,Co-EDTA and chromium mordanted fiber in rumen contents of dairy cows[J].J Anim Sci,57(suppl.1): 423
  • 6[4]Faichney G J.1975.The use of makers to partition digestion within the gastrointestinal tract of ruminants.In:Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (Eds I W MacDonald & A C I Warner)[M].Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit,277~291
  • 7[5]Merchen N R.1993.Digestion,absorption and excretion in ruminants.In: The Ruminant Animal Digestive Physiology and Nutrition (Ed by D C Church)[M].Reissued by Waveland Press,Inc.New Jersey,185~188
  • 8[6]Ortigues I,Oldham J D,Smith T et al.1990.A comparison between ytterbium acetate,ruthenium phenathroline and indigestible acid detergent fibre in a doublemarker system for intestinal flow measurement in steers[J].J Agri Sci,Cambridge 114:69~77
  • 9[7]Stern M D,Santos K A & Satter L D.1985.Protei degradation in rumen and amino acid absorption in small intestine of lactating dairy cattle fed heat-treated whole soybeans[J].J Dairy Sci,68:45~56
  • 10Laredo M A,Simpson G D,Minson D J,et al.The potential for using n-alkanes in tropical iorages as a marker for the determination of dry matter intake by grazing runminants[J].J Agric Sci,Camb.1991,117:355~361.

共引文献67

同被引文献75

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部