期刊文献+

美国对非市场经济体反补贴措施分析:历史转变、双重救济与合法性 被引量:4

U.S. Countervailing Measures on Non-market Economies: Historic Change, Double Remedy and Legality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国从2006年开始一反其长期坚持的不对非市场经济体适用反补贴的立场,此后,同时进行反倾销与反补贴调查成为美国对中国产品实施贸易救济的常用方式。WTO上诉机构已经裁决美国商务部在对非市场经济体实行"双反"时的双重计算问题,违反了WTO《补贴与反补贴措施协定》第19.3条所规定的征收反补贴税应当"在合适的数额"。为此,追溯与分析美国此类双重救济的根源与特点很有必要。 Since the USA reversed its long-standing policy of not imposing countervailing duty law on non -market economies in 2006, concurrent application of antidumping duties and countervailing duties has become the country's major trade remedy action against China. The WTO Appellate Body ruled that the US Depart- ment of Commerce's double counting of AD duties and CVDs against China violates the rule to levy CVDs'in the appropriate amounts' under Article 19.3 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. This article traces down and analyzes the key features of current double remedy practices in the USA.
作者 王中美
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第3期71-76,共6页 Finance and Trade Research
基金 德国马普比较法与国际私法研究院2011年度全球资助基金项目成果 完成于德国汉堡
关键词 反补贴税 非市场经济体 双重救济 countervailing duties non-market economies double remedies
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigations;Textiles,Apparel,and Related Products from the People’s Republic of China,48USFederal Register46600(Department of Commerce,13October1983).
  • 2Carbon Steel Wire Rod from Czechoslovakia;Final Negative Countervailing Duty Determination,US Federal Register,49,19372.
  • 3Continental Steel Co.v.United States,9C.I.T.347F.Supp.548(30July1985),at1318.
  • 4DOC,Countervailing Duty Investigation of Coated Free Sheet Paper from the People’s Republic of China-Whether the Analytical Ele-ments of the Georgetown Steel Opinion are Applicable to China’s Present-Day Economy,Memorandum(29March2007).
  • 5DOC,Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination in the Countervailing Duty Investigation of Coated Free Sheet Paperfrom the People’s Republic of China(17October2007).
  • 6Government of the People’s Republic of China v.United States,483F.Supp.2d1282(29March2007).
  • 7Ivo Van Bael and Jean Francois Belllis,1996,“Antidumping and other Trade Protection Laws of the EC”,3rd Edition,CCH Europe,92.
  • 8United States-Definitive Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on CERTAIN Products Form China:Request for the Establishment of aPanel by China,WT/DS392/2(12December2008).
  • 9WTO,United States-Definitive Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China:Request for the Establishmentof a Panel by China,WT/DS379/2(12December2008).
  • 10WTO Panel Report,United States-Definitive Antidumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China(US-AD/CVDon China),WT/DS379/R,adopted25March2011.

共引文献6

同被引文献25

  • 1张蹇.美国实施“双反”措施的法律依据探析[J].南京大学法律评论,2009(2):204-212. 被引量:4
  • 2Clive Stanbrook, Philip Bentley. 2010. Dumping and Subsidies: The Law and Procedures Governing the Imposition of Anti-dumping and Countervailing Duties in the European Community [M]. Third Edition. London: Kluwer Law International: 114.
  • 3Edwin Vermulst. 2005. The WTO Auti-dumping Agreement: A Commentary[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press:84.
  • 4Mallon Glenda, John Whalley. China's Post Accession WTO Stance[EB/OL]. [2014-12-01]. http://unpanl.un.org/ intradoc/groups/public/documents/APCITY/UNPAN020108.pdf.
  • 5Susanta Sekhar Das.2003.Antidumping as a Trade Remedy Measure: Evidence from Three Countries [M]. Bangalore: Indian Institute of Management, 21-22.
  • 6Vivian Jones.2007. Trade Remedy Legislation: Applying Countervailing Action to Nonmarket Economy Countries [R]. Custom House Site Meter, The Congressional Research Service.
  • 7USITC网站:http://www.usitc.gov/investigations/701731/2012/hardwood_plywood_china/preliminary.htm.
  • 8武长海.加拿大复合地板案与反补贴现状.国际商报,2005 年8 月29日第A04 版.
  • 9毛宁.中美铜版纸反补贴案对我们的启示[J].现代商贸工业,2008,20(10):155-156. 被引量:3
  • 10张斌,曹佳佳.美国对华反补贴中的价格比较基准问题研究[J].国际经贸探索,2009,25(5):51-52. 被引量:4

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部