期刊文献+

情绪作为道德判断的“催化剂”:道德判断中的评价倾向与特异性效应 被引量:5

Emotions as Moral Judgment “Catalyst”:Appraisal Tendency and Specific Effects in Moral Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在不同领域的道德判断中,情绪可能起着"催化剂"的作用。一种特定情绪对应一种核心评价;一种情绪只影响某一道德领域的判断,不同情绪的影响是特异性的;进化心理学和具身认知对道德判断中存在的评价倾向和特异性效应进行了解释。未来研究需要探索评价倾向与特异性效应的内在心理机制,以及进一步探讨文化等第三变量对不同情绪与特定领域道德判断的影响。 Emotions may play the "catalyst" role in different domain of moral judgment. A specific emotion corresponding to a core eval- uation; a kind of emotion affects only one certain field of moral judgment and the effect of distinct emotions are specific; evolutionary psychology and embodied cognition provide explanation to appraisal tendency framework and specific effects among moral judgment. Fu- ture research needs to explore the internal psychological mechanism of appraisal tendency and specific effects, and further probe into the influence of cultural and other third variables upon distinct emotions and moral judgment in specific domain.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2013年第6期489-493,共5页 Psychological Exploration
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目(11BSH046) 湖南师范大学青年优秀人才培养计划项目(2012YX04)
关键词 情绪 道德判断 评价倾向框架 领域特异性 情绪特异性 emotion moral judgment appraisal tendency framework domain - specificity emotion - specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献69

  • 1Huebner, B., Dwyer, S., & Hauser, M. (2009). The role ofemotion in moral psychology. Trends in CognitiveSciences, 13, 1–6.
  • 2Hutcherson, C. A., & Gross, J. J. (2011). The moral emotions:A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust andcontempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,100, 719–737.
  • 3Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2009). Conservativesare more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition andEmotion, 23, 714–725.
  • 4Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., Knobe, J., & Bloom, P. (2009).Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays.Emotion, 9, 435–439.
  • 5Jabbi, M., Swart, M., & Keysers, C. (2007). Empathy forpositive and negative emotions in the gustatory cortex.NeuroImage, 34, 1744–1753.
  • 6Jones, A., & Fitness, J. (2008). Moral hypervigilance: Theinfluence of disgust sensitivity in the moral domain.Emotion, 8, 613–627.
  • 7Kédia, G., Berthoz, S., Wessa, M., Hilton, D., & Martinot,J.-L. (2008). An agent harms a victim: A functionalmagnetic resonance imaging study on specific moralemotions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20,1788–1798.
  • 8Keltner, D., Horberg, E. J., & Oveis, C. (2006). Emotions asmoral intuitions. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Affect in socialthinking and behavior (pp. 161–175). New York:Psychology Press.
  • 9Kubber?d, E., Ueland, ?., Risvik, E., & Henjesand, I. J.(2006). A study on the mediating role of disgust with meatin the prediction of red meat consumption among youngfemales. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5, 281–291.
  • 10Lee, S. W. S., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Dirty hands and dirtymouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor isspecific to the motor modality involved in moraltransgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423–1425.

共引文献17

同被引文献137

引证文献5

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部