期刊文献+

母血HIF-1α水平联合胎心监护预测胎儿窘迫的价值 被引量:2

The Clinical Value of HIF-1α Levels in Maternal Blood and Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring for Fetal Distress
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨母血中缺氧诱导因子-1α(HIF-1α)水平及联合胎心监护预测胎儿窘迫的价值。方法选取40名正常妊娠孕妇(正常妊娠组)及95例胎儿窘迫孕妇(胎儿窘迫组)测定血清HIF-1α水平,同时进行胎心监护分析及新生儿Apgar评分。结果胎儿窘迫组母血HIF-1α水平为105.73±31.12pg/L,明显高于正常妊娠组(41.48±18.91pg/L);其中,胎儿窘迫组胎心监护阳性者,母血HIF-1α水平为138.98±30.56 pg/L;可疑者为94.21±28.93 pg/L,两者的HIF-1α水平均明显高于正常妊娠组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);而胎心监护为阴性者母血HIF-1α水平为47.34±18.76pg/L,与正常妊娠组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);在胎儿窘迫三组间,HIF-1α两两比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。胎儿窘迫组母血HIF-1α水平与新生儿Apgar评分呈负相关。结论母血HIF-1α水平可作为预测胎儿窘迫的一种新指标,胎心监护联合HIF-1α水平测定可提高判断胎儿宫内缺氧的准确性。 Objective To explore the value of detection of hypoxia- inducible factor- 1α ( HIF- 1α) level in maternal blood and fetal heart rate (FHR)monitoring patterns for fetal distress. Methods Ninety five patients with fetal distress ( fetal distress group) and 40 healthy pregnant women ( control group) were involved in this study. The levels of serum HIF-1α were measured. The fetal heart rate monitoring and the newborn Aparg's scores were assessed. Results The levels of HIF-1 α in maternal blood in fetal distress group were markedly higher than that in control group (105.73±31.12 vs 41.48± 18.91 pg/L). In fetal distress group, as for HIF-1α levels in maternal blood, the fetal heart monitoring positive was 138.98± 30.56 pg/L, the suspicious person was 94.21±28.93 pg/L, they were all significantly higher than that in the control group( P 〈 0.01 ). The fetal heart monitoring negative was 47.34± 18.76pg/L. There was no significant difference between the fetal heart monitoring negative and the control group ( P 〉 0.05 ). A significant difference was found in three groups withthe fetal distress ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The level of HIF- 1α in maternal blood was negative correlated with newborn Aparg's score. Conclusion The level of HIF-1α in maternal blood can be used as a new index of predicting fetal distress. The fetal heart monitoring combined determination of HIF-1α could improve the accuracy of assessment of intrauterine fetal anoxia.
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2013年第6期396-398,共3页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基金 2012年度南通市科技计划(指导性)项目(HS12965)
关键词 胎儿窘迫 缺氧诱导因子-1Α 胎心监护 酶联免疫吸附法 :Fetal distress Hypoxia-inducible factor- 1α Fetal heart rate monitoring Enzyme linkedimmunosorbent assay
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Sakamoto T, Seiki M. Mint3 enhances the activity of hypoxia-induc- ible factor- 1 in macrophages by suppressing the activity of factor in- hibiting HIF- 1 [ J ]. Biol Chem, 2009,284 (44) : 30350 - 30359.
  • 2Yamamot O, Ibsuki M, Okumura Y, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1- alpha is closely linked to an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2008,104(3) :465-475.
  • 3Cameron C, Harding F, Hu W S, et at. Activation of hypoxic response in human embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies[ J ]. Exp Bi- ol Med,2008,233 (8) : 1044-1057.
  • 4Taylor C. Mitochondria and cellular oxygen sensing in the HIF path- way [ J]. Biol Chem,2008,409 ( 1 ) : 19-26.
  • 5Dakouane G, Alfaidy N, Bayle P, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 controls the expression of the uncoordinated-5-B receptor, but not of netrin- 1, in first trimester human placenta [ J ]. Int J Dev Biol, 2011, 55 ( 10-12) :981-987.
  • 6Patel J,Landers K, Mortimer R H, et al. Regulation of hypoxia in- ducible factors (H/F) in hypoxia and normoxia during placental de- velopment [J]. Placenta,2010,31 ( 11 ) :951-957.
  • 7Rajakumar A, Michael H M, Daftary A, et al. Proteasomal activity in placentas from women with preeclampsia and intrauterine growth re- striction: implications for expression of HIF-alpha proteins [ J]. Placenta, 2008,29 ( 3 ) : 290- 299.
  • 8杨新月.胎儿监护的研究进展[J].当代医学,2010,16(6):22-23. 被引量:5
  • 9张力,胡晓吟,刘兴会.胎儿监护手段应用的循证医学评价[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2010,26(2):101-106. 被引量:23

二级参考文献38

  • 1陈美秀,李立.产时胎心电子监护预防低分儿的出生[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2005,26(2):166-167. 被引量:2
  • 2徐红兵,曹珍修,吴味辛.脐动脉舒张末期血流缺如的胎儿血液动力学变化与围产儿结局的关系[J].中华围产医学杂志,2005,8(2):92-96. 被引量:26
  • 3焦玲洁,张珂.远程胎儿监护在高危妊娠中的临床应用[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(6):373-374. 被引量:14
  • 4Creasy R, Reznik R, Iams J. Maternal fetal medicine principles and practice[M]. 5th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders,2003 : 123.
  • 5Chauhan SP, Doherty DD, Magann EF, et al. Amniotic fluid index vs single deepest pocket technique during modified biophysical profile: a randomized clinical trial [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004,191 (2) :661-667.
  • 6Morris JM, Thompson K, Smithey J, et al. The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study[ J]. BJOG, 2003,110( 11 ) :989-994.
  • 7Manning FA. Fetal biophysical profile: a critical appraisal [ J ]. Clin Obstet Gynecol,2002,45 (4) :975-985.
  • 8Lalor JG, Fawole B, Alfirevic Z, et al. Biophysical profile for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [ J ]. The Cochrane Library, 2009, Issue 3: CD000038.
  • 9Harrington K, Fayyad A, Thakur V, et al. The value of uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of uteroplacental complications in muhiparous women[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneeol,2004,23 ( 1 ) :50-55.
  • 10Neilson JP, Alfirevic Z. Doppler ultrasound for fetal assessment in high risk pregnancies [ Cochrane review]. // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1996 Issue 4. Chichester (UK) : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1996. DOI: 10. 1002/ 14651858. CD000073.

共引文献25

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部