期刊文献+

强制上网政策下的可再生能源电力供应链收益分配 被引量:4

Benefit Distribution of Renewable Energy Electricity Supply Chain under Mandatory Access Policy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为研究强制上网政策对可再生能源电力供应链各主体收益分配的影响,设置从价格或数量进行管制的4种政策情景;基于一个发电企业和一个电网企业组成的两级供应链,建立Stackberg博弈模型,并运用逆向归纳法求出各主体的最优收益;比较分析4种政策下的收益分配结果。研究表明可再生能源发电成本是影响供应链收益分配的关键因子;政府定价或定量可增加供应链主体收益,但不能保障收益合理分配;数量管制有利于实现可再生能源发展目标,价格放松有利于内化额外发电成本。从收益增加和合理分配角度,配额制是可再生能源电力政策重要方向。 Mandatory access policy has a significant impact on the benefit distribution among the renewable electricity supply chain parts.Aiming at the analysis of the effect,four policy scenarios about price or quantity control are set.Based on a two-level supply chain composed of a generator and a grid model,a game model is built by using Stackberg theory,and the optimal benefit of the parties is solved by backward induction.Analysis of the benefit distribution results under four policy scenarios is compared.Results show that the generation cost is a key factor to the benefit distribution.Control policies about price or quality contribute to the benefit improvement,but cannot guarantee the rational allocation.Quantitative control is conducive to the realization of the renewable energy development goals,and price relaxes conducive to the internalization of the additional cost of power generation.It is concluded that the quota policy is the renewable electricity policy direction,in view of benefit increase and distribution.
出处 《工业工程》 北大核心 2013年第3期14-20,共7页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费个人项目(CDJXS11020006)
关键词 强制上网 供应链 可再生能源 收益分配 mandatory access supply chain renewable energy benefit distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献75

共引文献42

同被引文献49

  • 1李学栋.论管理机制设计理论[J].工业工程,2005,8(2):1-3. 被引量:7
  • 2余祖松,许惠煌.我国能源利用效益的计量经济模型[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2006(5):105-107. 被引量:3
  • 3罗东晓.国内液化石油气市场前景分析[J].天然气工业,2007,27(10):126-128. 被引量:8
  • 4孙静春,席酉民,王建伟.价格变化率对城市车用天然气供需平衡影响的仿真分析[J].系统工程,2007,25(9):42-48. 被引量:1
  • 5Fischer C, Preonas L. Combining polices for renewable energy: Is the whole less than the sum of its parts?[J]. Resource for the Future Discussion Paper, 2010: 10-19.
  • 6Robinson C. Markets, imperfections and the dangers of over-regulating energy markets[J]. Economic Affairs, 2004, 24(2): 52-55.
  • 7Owen A D. Environmental externalities, market distortions and the economics of renew able energy technologies[J]. The Energy Journal, 2004, 25(3): 127-156.
  • 8Butler L, Neuhoff K. Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development[J]. Renewable Energy, 2008, 33(8): 3887-3897.
  • 9Fischer C, Newell R G. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 55(2): 142-162.
  • 10Jennifer F M. Combining a renewable portfolio standard with a cap-and-trade policy: A general equilibrium analysis[R]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009.

引证文献4

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部