摘要
目的:探讨平板运动试验Duke评分对冠心病诊断的价值。方法:选择疑诊冠心病的患者200例,两周内分别完成生化检查、平板运动试验及冠脉造影检查,对平板运动试验Duke评分(DTS)及冠脉造影结果进行比较分析。结果:冠脉造影结果被视为诊断冠心病的金标准。(1)与平板运动试验比较:单独DTS阳性诊断冠心病的特异性(72.3%比55.4%,x^2=5.161,P=0.021)显著降低;运动试验联合DTS显著提高诊断冠心病的敏感性(72.6%比87.8%,x^2=7.860,P=0.005)、阴性预测值(56%比76.9%,x^2=6.128,P=0.013);(2)与DTS阳性比较,运动试验联合DTS显著提高诊断冠心病的敏感性(76.3%比87.8%,x^2=4.334,P=0.037)、阴性预测值(52.9%比76.9%,x^2=7.298,P=0.007)、准确性(69.5%比80.8%,x^2=5.849,P=0.016)。结论:联合应用运动试验及Duke评分可显著提高诊断冠心病的敏感性、阴性预测值和准确度。
Objective: TO explore value of treadmill test Duke score on diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: A total of 200 patients suspected CHD were selected. All patients received biochemical examinations, treadmill exercise test (TET) and coronary angiography (CAG) within two weeks. The results of TET, Duke+readmill score (DTS) and CAG were compared and analyzed. Results: The CAG was regard as gold standard diagnosing CHD. (1) Compared with TET alone, there were significant decrease in specificity (72.3% vs. 55.4%, Х^2= 5. 161, P=0. 021) in positive DTS alone for diagnosing CHD; there were significant increase in sensitivity (72.6% vs. 87.8%, 7.2=7.860, P=0.005), negative predictive value (56% vs. 76.9%, Х^2=6.128, P=0.013) in combined use of TET and DTS for diagnosing CHD; (2) Compared with positive DTS alone, there were significant increase in sensitivity (76.3% vs. 87. 8%, Х^2=4. 334, P=0. 037), negative predictive value (52. 9% vs. 76.9%, Х^2=7. 298, P=0. 007) and accuracy (69.5% vs. 80. 8%, Х^2=5.849, P=0. 016) in combined use of TET and DTS. Conclusion: Combined use of treadmill exercise test and Duke score can significantly increase sensitivity, negative predictive value and accuracy diagnosing CHD.
出处
《心血管康复医学杂志》
CAS
2013年第6期611-615,共5页
Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词
运动试验
冠状动脉疾病
诊断
Exercise test
Coronary artery disease
Diagnosis