期刊文献+

基于全过程的航空公司签派员安全绩效考核指标体系设计 被引量:9

Designing a system of safety performance evaluation indicators based on the entire flight process for the airline dispatchers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为客观评价航空公司签派员的工作状况,提高其安全绩效水平,通过对签派员的工作任务进行分析,基于全过程管理思想,将员工安全状况的发展趋势纳入考核体系,从而得到签派员安全绩效考核的3类指标:过程指标、结果指标和趋势指标。采用模糊综合评价方法建立了风险评估模型,并利用层次分析法(AHP)确定各指标的权重。运用此模型对某航空公司签派人员进行安全绩效考核。结果表明,该模型可以对签派员进行有效的安全绩效考核,考核结果可信。在绩效考核过程中,需更多注重签派员日常工作中的过程指标考核和反映安全状况趋势的趋势指标考核。 This paper is intended to establish an objective evaluation system of safety performance indicators based on the entire flight pro cess for the airline dispatchers. As is well known, the dispatchers play an important role in securing the safety flight operation in orga nizing the aircraft operation and management in an airline transporta tion. In proceeding with our research, we have first of all come up with the safety performance indicators through repetitive evaluation necessary for guaranteeing and improving the safety performance level of all the airline dispatchers. Based on the entireprocess evaluation idea in mind, we have done careful analysis of the tasks of dispatch ers and divided the tasks involved into three levels ( A C ). Withlevel B including the three types of indicators : the process indicators, the results indicators and the trend indicators. At the same time, lev el C includes 18 indicators with each of the B indicators subdivided into 6 subindexes. While calculating the weights of 18 specific indi cators likely to be the affecting factors by the methods of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), we have established a risk evaluation model by using the method of fuzzy mathematics theory. And, then, we have made an effort in applying the safety performance evaluation fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on AHP to the dispatch er' s safety performance evaluation. The results of the application tests prove that the actual dispatcher' s levels in safety performance that can be tested are consistent with the "security model" illustrated. Thus, the model can be taken as credible in evaluating the actual safety performance of the airline dispatchers. In addition, the results also reflect that it is necessary for the air flight company managers to pay more attention to the daily observation of the duty sense of the dispatchers so as to timely find the dispatchers' safety dutysense changes in their working posts. Apart from that, what we should be aware that no safety performance evaluation systems or methods are perfect. No methods can be the best; there is only the right, and the better. And, it can also be said that the most suitable is the best. Therefore, it can also be said that the system of the safety perfor mance evaluation indicators should and can be made and improved in close accordance with their own actual situation through the research of the ways of how to improve the evaluation system constantly in a gradual and continuous process.
出处 《安全与环境学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期228-231,共4页 Journal of Safety and Environment
基金 天津市教委科研计划项目(20112132) 中国民航大学科研基金项目(08CAUCE10)
关键词 安全管理工程 签派员 安全绩效 全过程 层次分析法 模糊综合评价 safety control dispatchers safety performance whole-process hierarchy process analysis fuzzy comprehen-sive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Annex 6 Operation of aircraft[S]. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2006.
  • 2International Civil Aviation Organization. Safety management manual, Doc 9859. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2012.
  • 3AC-121/135-FS—2008-26 Introduction to safety management systems for air operators(关于航空运营人安全管理体系的要求)[S].
  • 4谢春生,赵煜,韩红蓉.签派工作中的人为因素分析[J].中国民航飞行学院学报,2007,18(5):18-20. 被引量:19
  • 5CHRISTIAN M S. Workplace safety: a meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94(5): 1103 1127.
  • 6ZOHAR D. A group-level model of safety climate: testing the effect of group climate on microaccedents in manufacturing jobs[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(4): 587-596.
  • 7REASON J. Human error[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  • 8HUANG Bin(黄彬). Research on relationships between organizational citizenship behavior and safety performance of airline staff(航空公司员工组织公民行为与安全绩效的关系研究). Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2012.
  • 9LEI Xiaolin(雷小林). Study on performance appraisal about personnel in key position of airline(我国航空公司关键岗位人员绩效评估研究). Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007.
  • 10张江石,傅贵,任翔,李军.安全氛围要素构成与重要性排序[J].安全与环境学报,2010,10(1):137-141. 被引量:9

二级参考文献43

  • 1曾志斌,李言,李淑娟.基于模糊层次分析的虚拟企业风险评价[J].模糊系统与数学,2006,20(4):134-140. 被引量:14
  • 2苏世彬,黄瑞华.基于三角模糊数的属性层次模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(12):115-119. 被引量:26
  • 3宋洪涛,张力,王以群,廉士乾.用层次分析法分析核电站中影响人误的组织因素[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(5):32-37. 被引量:11
  • 4中国民用航空总局.大型飞机公共航空运输承运人运行合格审定规则CCAR-121-R2[Z],2005.2.
  • 5Reason, J. Managing the risks of organizational accidents[M]. Aldershot: Ashgate Pub Ltd, 1997
  • 6Reason J. Human Error[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990
  • 7IAEA. Organizational factors influencing human performance in nuclear power plants[R]. IAEA -TECDOC -943, INIS Clearinghouse of IAEA, Vienna, 1995
  • 8Vaquero, C. , Garces, M. I. , & Rodriguez-Pomeda, J. Impact of organization and management on complex technological systems safety': The nuclear lessons[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2000,20 (1 -2):214- 241
  • 9Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method [M]. Oxford(UK): Elsevier Science Ltd, 1998
  • 10Jacobs R, Haber S. Organizational processes and nuclear power plant safety[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1994,45:75 - 83

共引文献40

同被引文献68

引证文献9

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部