期刊文献+

高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中经皮左心室辅助装置的应用:Mayo医院的经验

Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : The Mayo Clinic Experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1文献来源 Alli OO, Singh IM, Holmes DR Jr, et al.Percutaneous left ventricular assist device with TandemHeart for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention : The Mayo Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, clinic experience [ J]. 2012,80(5) : 728-734.
作者 郭伟 董太明
机构地区 广东省人民医院
出处 《循证医学》 CSCD 2013年第6期342-345,351,共5页 The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
关键词 左心室辅助装置 TandemHeart 高危经皮冠状 动脉介入治疗 Mayo医院 left ventrieular assist device TandemHeart high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention Mayo clinic
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1A1-Husami W, Yturralde F, Mohanty G, et al. Single-center experience with the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device to support patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2008,20 (6) : 319-322.
  • 2Gimelli G, Wolff MR. Hemodynamically supported percutaneous coronary revascularization improves left ventricular function in patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy at very high risk for surgery: A single-center experience [J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2008,20(12) : 642-646.
  • 3Rajdev S, Krishnan P, Irani A, et al. Clinical application of prophylactic percutaneous left ventricular assist device (TandemHeart) in high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention using an arterial preclosure technique:Single-center experience [ J ]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2008,20(2) : 67-72.
  • 4Thomas JL, A1-Ameri H, Economides C, et al. Use of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device for high-risk cardiac interventions and cardiogenic shock [J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2010,22(8) : 360-364.
  • 5Vranckx P, Meliga E, De Jaegere PP, et al. The TandemHeart, percutaneous transseptal left ventricular assist device: A safeguard in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. The six-year Rotterdam experience [J]. Eurolntervention, 2008,4(3) : 331-337.
  • 6Burkhoff D, Cohen H, Brunckhorst C, et al. A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock [J]. AHJ, 2006, 152 (3) :469 el-469 e8.
  • 7Thiele H, Sick P, Boudriot E, et al. Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricu]ar assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by eardiogenic shock [J]. Eur Heart J, 2005,26(13) : 1276-183.
  • 8Perera D, Stables R, Thomas M, et al. Elective intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA, 2010,304(8) : 867-874.
  • 9W ON. Prospective Muhicenter Trial Comparing Impella 2.5 to [ABP in high risk PC[. Presented at the American College ofCardiology Meeting, New Orleans 2010.
  • 10Burkhoff D, O'Neill W, Brunckhorst C, et al. Feasibility study of the use of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device for treatment of cardiogenic shock [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006,68 (2) : 211-217.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部