期刊文献+

基于刚度需求设计的轻型消能摇摆架减震性态分析 被引量:24

Performance analysis of light energy dissipative rocking frame designed on the basis of stiffness demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据不同层数框架结构的的刚度需求,以控制结构一阶模态下的层间位移集中系数为性能目标,设计轻型消能摇摆架并基于性能的损伤指标对结构进行性态分析。对带有摇摆架4层、8层和12层的RC框架分别在近场有脉冲、近场无脉冲和远场地震动作用下结构进行动力时程分析,确定结构刚度需求与层数的关系,然后据此针对6层RC框架设计轻型摇摆架(LRF)和自复位耗能支撑(SCED),基于OpenSees在近场有脉冲和无脉冲地震动多遇、设防和罕遇水平下进行非线性动力时程分析。与原结构相比,加入自复位消能摇摆架后,结构的损伤状态得到明显的改善,损伤分布更加均匀,有效地降低了结构的位移响应和残余位移。 According to stiffness demand of RC frames of variable stories, the Drift Concentration Factor (DCF) under 1st mode is taken as performance control point, to design a Light Energy Dissipative Rocking Frame (EDLRF)and analyze its performance state with performance-based damage index. The seismic responses of 4-story, 8-story, and 12-storey RC frame structures are analyzed under near-field ground motions with velocity pulses, without velocity pulses and far-field ones. The relationship between structure stiffness demand and stories is given through curve fitting. Nonlinear dynamic time-history analysis under near-field ground motion sets with velocity pulses and without velocity pulses corresponding to three hazard levels were performed by OpenSees. Compared to original structure under the cases considered, the damage state of structure is improved, damage distribution is more even, and the displacement and residual drift is controlled more effectively.
出处 《土木工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第1期24-35,共12页 China Civil Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(50978130 51178211)
关键词 性态 刚度需求 摇摆架 自复位 耗能 OpenSees软件 performance stiffness demand rocking frame self-centering energy dissipation OpenSees software
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献61

  • 1李爽,谢礼立.近场脉冲型地震动对钢筋混凝土框架结构影响[J].沈阳建筑大学学报(自然科学版),2006,22(3):406-410. 被引量:28
  • 2FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines and commentary for seismic rehabilitation of buildings [ S ]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997.
  • 3FEMA 356 Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings[ S]. Washington DC, USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000.
  • 4FEMA 445 Next-generation performance-based seismic design guidelines: program plan for new and existing buildings [ S]. Washington DC, USA : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007.
  • 5Report of the seventh joint planning meeting of NEES/ E-defense collaborative research on earthquake engineering[ R]. PEER 2010/109. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, 2010.
  • 6Roh H. Seismic behavior of structures using rocking columns and viscous dampers [ D ]. Buffalo : University at Buffalo, The State University of New York. Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering, 2007.
  • 7Housner G W. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes [ J ]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963, 53 (2) : 403- 417.
  • 8Hukelbridge A A, Clough R W. Preliminary experimental study of seismic uplift of a steel frame [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/22. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 9Hukelbridge A A. Earthquake simulation tests of a nine story steel frame with columns allowed to uplift [ R ]. Report No. UCB/EERC-77/23. Berkely: University of California, Berkely, 1977.
  • 10Priestley M J N, Evison R J, Carr A J. Seismic response of structures free to rock on their foundations [ J ]. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 1978, 11 (3) : 141-150.

共引文献277

同被引文献112

引证文献24

二级引证文献195

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部