期刊文献+

丹红注射液治疗不稳定型心绞痛疗效观察 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察丹红注射液治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床疗效。方法:选取不稳定型心绞痛120例,随机分为观察组和对照组各60例。对照组采用常规治疗,观察组在对照组基础上加用丹红注射液治疗。均治疗3周,观察两组临床症状和心绞痛发作改善情况。结果:观察组临床症状改善59例,占98.3%;对照组44例,占73.3%。两组比较,差异显著(P<0.05)。观察组心绞痛发作次数显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:在常规治疗基础上,加用丹红注射液,改善心绞痛和冠状动脉供血效果好。
作者 李继永
出处 《人民军医》 2014年第1期58-59,共2页 People's Military Surgeon
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献61

  • 1胡大一,孙艺红.冠心病药物治疗的最新进展和展望[J].中国实用内科杂志:临床前沿版,2006,26(1):88-91. 被引量:49
  • 2邓芬,胡长林,谢运兰.步长倍通丹红注射液对血小板膜糖蛋白的影响[J].中医杂志,2006,47(10):725-725. 被引量:56
  • 3柯元南,陈纪林.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(4):295-304. 被引量:2139
  • 4马今.不稳定性心绞痛病生理研究进展[J].心肺血管病杂志,1999,18(2):159-159.
  • 5King SB 3rd, Smith SC Jr, Hirshfdd JW Jr, et al. 2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guiddine Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Assodation Task Force on Practice Guidelines= 2007 Writing Group to Review New Evidence and Update the ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Writing on Behalf of the 2005 Writing Committee[J]. Circulation, 2008, 117(2): 261-295.
  • 6Hochman JS, Lamas GA, Buller CE, et al. Coronary intervention for persistent occlusion after myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355 (23): 2395-2407.
  • 7Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimai medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356 (15): 1503-1516.
  • 8Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutancous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(10): 9619-72.
  • 9Serruys PW, Ong AT, Morice MC, et al. Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study Part Ⅱ: Sirolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of patients with multivessel de norvo coronary artery lesions[J]. Euro Intervention, 2005, 1(2) : 147-156.
  • 10Patel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, et al. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoradc Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Sodety of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2009, 53(6):530-553.

共引文献2788

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部