期刊文献+

改良隐瘢痕腹腔镜与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术对比研究 被引量:4

Comparison of modified umbilical laparoscopic operation and single-hole cholecystectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良经脐及白线隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊手术的临床疗效及应用价值。方法回顾性分析2011年6月至2013年5月江西省宜丰县人民医院收治的胆囊结石患者193例,随机分为二组,观察组行改良经脐及白线隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊手术,对照组行常规单孔法腹腔镜手术。对比分析二组患者手术时间、术后切口疼痛程度、术后切口满意程度及中转率。结果观察组比对照组手术时间短,差异有统计学意义(t=14.72,P<0.000 1)。观察组术后1 d切口疼痛程度明显轻于对照组(t=11.42,P<0.000 1);术后2 d切口疼痛程度差异无统计学意义(t=1.26,P=0.10)。术后患者切口满意程度差异无统计学意义(t=1.51,P=0.067);对照组有3例中转手术。二组均无胆管损伤、术后出血、胆漏等并发症发生。结论改良经脐及白线隐瘢痕腹腔镜胆囊手术安全、可行,不需要特殊器械,术后瘢痕不明显且隐蔽,手术难度不高,术后患者切口满意度高,是一种美观、安全的腹腔镜手术新途径,适合在基层医院推广。 Objective To investigate the effectiveness and value of the umbilical and white scar hidden laparoscopic operation. Methods A total of 193 patients with gallstone recruited from The People's Hospital of Yifeng County from June 2011 to May 2013 were retrospectively analyzed and randomly classified into two groups. The patients in the observation group were treated by umbilical and white scar hidden laparoscopic gallbladder operation. The patients in the control group were applied with traditional single-hole laporoscopic operation. The two groups of patients with operation time, pain after operation, postoperative incision satisfaction and transfer rate were compared. Results the operation time is shorter in the observation group with statistically significant difference ( t = 14. 72, P 〈 0. 000 1 ). After one day, The degree of incision pain was more serious in the observation group than that of the control group ( t = 11.42, P 〈 0. 000 1 ). There was no significant difference in the postoperative incision pain in the second day after operation (t = 1. 26, P = 0. 10). No significant difference in the patients with postoperative incision satisfaction was found (t = 1.51 ,P =0.067 ). There were 3 cases who were converted to operation. No bile duct injury , bleeding, bile leakage and other complications in the two groups were observed. Conclusions The modified umbilical and white scar hidden laparoscopic gallbladder operation is safe and feasible, which is a new way of laparoscopic operation and suitable for primary care.
出处 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》 2013年第6期25-27,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 胆囊切除术 腹腔镜 对比研究 Cholecystectomy, laparoscopic Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献72

  • 1朱江帆,胡海,马颖璋,徐曼珠,李峰,郁林海,肖怀文.经脐入路腹腔镜手术的初步临床报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(1):75-77. 被引量:143
  • 2刘彦.腹腔镜手术第一穿刺方法的思考与实践[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2001,2(5):263-264. 被引量:12
  • 3胡海,所广军.腹腔镜胆囊切除术术式探讨[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2006,27(2):97-98. 被引量:14
  • 4Rao GV (2006). Transgastric appendectomy results and follow up, SAGES transgastric surgery panel [ C ]. Presented at SAGES Meeting,2006.
  • 5Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, et al. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy:a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity[ J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2004,60 (1) :114-117.
  • 6Zorron R, Filqueiras M, Maggioni LC, et al. Transvaginal cholecystectomy : report of the first case [ J ]. Surg Innov,2007,14 (4) : 279-283.
  • 7Zornig C, Emmermann A, Von Waldenfels HA, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and trasnumbilical approach [ J ]. Endoscopy,2007,9 (10) :913-915.
  • 8Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, et al. Surgery without scars : report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being [ J ]. Arch Surg, 2007,142 (9) : 823-826.
  • 9Kosumi T, Kubota A, Usui N, et al. Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy using a single umbilical puncture method [ J ]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2001,11 ( 1 ) : 63-65.
  • 10Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Fasola M, et al. One-trocar salpingectomy for the treatment of tubal pregnancy:a "marionette-like" technique [J]. BJOG,2005 ,112(10) :1417-1419.

共引文献350

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部