摘要
目的循证医学PICOS模式与PBL教学法相结合的方式与传统教学方法进行对照研究。方法 66例进入呼吸内科实习生被随机分为试验组(循证医学PICOS模式+PBL法)及对照组(传统教学法)。教学结束后两组同学同时进行考试考核。比较两组学生的呼吸内科考试卷面成绩及问卷调查结果分析。结果两组同学理论考试成绩差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但查阅文献、临床思维能力实验组高于对照组(P<0.05)。讨论临床思维及查阅文献能力循证医学PICOS模式结合PBL教学法明显优于传统教学法。
Objective To try to use evidence-based medicine PICOS model with PBL teaching method and traditional teaching methods to control study. Methods 66 cases into the respiratory medicine interns were randomly divided into experimental group (PICOS mode of evidence-based medicine (ebm)+PBL method) and the control group (traditional teaching method). After teaching two groups of students at the same time to test. Comparison of the two groups of students took respiratory medicine examination result and the result of questionnaire analysis. Results There was no significant difference theory of two groups of students examination results (P〉0.05). But the literature, clinical thinking ability, experimental group was higher than the eontroi group (P〈0.05). Discuss clinical thinking and the ability of evidence-based medicine through the literature PICOS model combining + PBL teaching method is superior to the traditional teaching method.
出处
《继续医学教育》
2013年第12期53-54,共2页
Continuing Medical Education
关键词
循证医学PICOS模式
PBL教学法
临床实习
医学本科生
Evidence-based medicine PICOS mode
Guiding type teaching method
Clinical practice
Medicalundergraduates