多维度看待“给力”上《人民日报》之现象

Multiple-dimension Views on“Gei-Li”Published on The People's Daily

"给力"上《人民日报》的现象需要人们多维度地客观地对待。"给力"这个词很火的原因主要有三:其一是因为它本身具有强大的表现功能;其二它是识时务的"俊杰",恰好迎合人们语言表达习惯的诉求和喜好;其三它借助主流媒体《人民日报》的使用造成广泛传播。网络热词"给力"的使用应坚持"适度"原则,不能过多地滥用,否则人们会产生"审美疲劳"。2010年《人民日报》使用的51个新词语的平均词长是3.29;其主要的结构方式是偏正式。因此《人民日报》中的50个新词语词长和构成方式都符合语言规范,《人民日报》使用"给力"一词不应该也不致于被蒙上不严肃、不负责的面纱。现在多数语言学家们倡导面对新的语言现象要做观察者、研究者,而不要做"语言警察"。

＂Gei-Li＂ ＇s appearance on the People＇s Daily is a phenomenon we should regard in different dimensions and objectively. The reason for its popularity may mainly eount on the following three points： primarily, it is based on its mighty function of expression; secondly, it is that it meets people＇s requirement and favor for the language performances; lasdy, it takes advantage of those main-stream media＇s distribution. After all, the using of the network hat word should adhere to principle of ＂moderation＂, or it will bring aesthetic tiring to readers. In 2010, the average length of the 51 new words appeared on People＇s Daily is 3.29, and the main structure of them is modifier-bead. So it ean be figured out that 50 of them conform to the rules for the length and strueture of the new words, thus, ＂Gei-Li＂ on the People＇ s Daily shouldn＇ t, as well as be unlikely veiled with unseriousness or irresponsible. As in current time, many linguists are adveoating to be an observer and researcher when facing the new language phenomenon instead of being a ＂tongue police＂.