期刊文献+

生命伦理视域下我国强制隔离戒毒人员的尊严问题

A Study on Dignity Issues of the Compulsory Isolation Detoxification Personnel Based on Bioethics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,我国实行强制隔离戒毒的效果并不理想。从生命伦理学的视角看,强制隔离戒毒长期限制戒毒人员的人身自由,戒毒人员的人身安全和医疗救治得不到保障,有偿劳动难以落实,从而严重伤害了戒毒人员的心理尊严、生命尊严和劳动尊严。进行有尊严的戒毒改革,需变强制性、大规模隔离戒毒为自愿的、社区服务治疗为主的小规模隔离戒毒,变劳动康复与社区戒毒就业安置为行为治疗及与社会接轨的职业技能培训,并发放最低生活保障金,鼓励其参与正常就业竞聘、实现自我价值,以保护戒毒人员"做人"的尊严和生命尊严,重塑戒毒人员的社会尊严和人格尊严。有尊严的戒毒将成为未来社会戒毒的主导模式和戒毒改革的努力方向。 At present,China’s compulsory isolation detoxification is not very effective from the perspective of bioethics in that compulsory isolation detoxification restricts the personal freedom of the addicts for so long a time that the personal safety and medical treatment of the patients abstained from drugs cannot be guaranteed and it is difficult to implement the system of paid laboring,thus seriously injuring their psychological dignity, life dignity and labor dignity.In order to reform the current detoxification system,it is necessary to change the large-scale isolation detoxification for the small-scale voluntary and mandatory community-oriented service treatment,to change the laboring rehabilitation and community rehabilitation of job -providing to behavioral therapy and society-adaptation-oriented vocational skill training,and to offer the minimum living allowance to them so as to encourage their participation in employment competition and the realization of self value after they are released.In this way,the "human"dignity and life dignity of the patients abstained from drugs can be maintained,and their social dignity and personality dignity can be restored.A dignified addict rehabilitation will become the dominant mode and the major reform trend of the future society.
出处 《昆明理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2013年第6期1-5,共5页 Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"人的尊严在生命伦理学中的理论地位和社会应用"(11BZX074)
关键词 生命伦理 强制隔离戒毒 尊严 有偿劳动 职业技能培训 bioethics compulsory isolation detoxification dignity paid labor vocational skill training
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1韩跃红,孙书行.人的尊严和生命的尊严释义[J].哲学研究,2006(3):63-67. 被引量:69
  • 2肖巍.公共健康伦理:概念、使命与目标[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,30(3):107-112. 被引量:35
  • 3Ruth Macklin. Dignity is a Useless Concept[J]. BMJ, 2003,327 : 1 190-1 420.
  • 4The President' s Council on Bioethics. Human Dignity and Bioeth ics:Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics [C]. Washington, D. C. : President' s Council on Bioethics, 2008.
  • 5President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medi cine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Deciding to Forgo Life-sustaining Treatment [M]. Washington, DC: US Govern ment Printing Office, 1983:24.
  • 6President's Council on Bioethics. Human Cloning and Human Dignity[C]. Washington, DC: President’ s Council on Bioethics, Hu man Cloning and Human Dignity, 2002.
  • 7Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genetics and human behavior[R/ OL].(2006-09-07) [2008-09-02]. http://www, nuffieldbioethics, org/go/ourwork/behaviouralgenetics/publication _ 311. ht ml.
  • 8Stanley M. Gianner. Dignity is a Moral Imperative[J/OL]. (2003-12-25)[2008-09 -02]. http://www, bmj. com/cgi/eletters/327/ 7429/1419 # 44696.
  • 9康德.道德形而上学基础[M]//周辅成.西方伦理学名著选辑.北京:商务印书馆,1996:371.
  • 10联合国.联合国宪章[R/OL].(2006)[2008-08-02].http://www.un.org/chinese/aboutun/charter/preamble.him.

共引文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部