期刊文献+

泸县沼水蛙16SrRNA基因克隆与系统发育分析 被引量:2

Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of the 16SrRNA gene of Hylarana Guentheri from Luxian County in Southern China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对采于四川省泸县地区的沼水蛙(Hylaranaguentheri)线粒体16SrRNA基因进行扩增测序。经3对扩增引物分别扩增及测序获得长度为550bp、300bp、1000bp核苷酸序列,拼接后序列长度1601bp。核苷酸相似性分析表明,序列与Genbank公布的福建的沼水蛙线粒体16SrRNA基因(KF185060)核苷酸序列相似性最高(99.8%);与越南地区沼水蛙的16S序列相似性也较高(99%~99.7%),无明显种间差异,从遗传上证明沼水蛙为广布物种。同时,与亲源关系较近的水蛙类代表物种构建的系统发育树显示。所有沼水蛙聚为一支系,然后与Ranalateralis互为姊妹群。本文同时也对水蛙类的系统发育关系做了初步讨论。 The present paper clones and sequences the mitochondrial 16SrRNA of Hylarana guentheri from Luxian county in Sichuan province. Three nucleotide sequences (550bp, 300bp, 1000bp) have been cloned and sequenced with 3 pairs of primer were assembled into a complete 1601bp contig. The result shows that the sequence was 99.8% identical to that of another H. guentheri sample from Fujian province (KF185060), and 99% - 99.7% to the ones from Vietnam. This result proves H. guentheri to be a widespread species geneti- cally. Further, the phylogenetic analysis including available 16S sequences of Hylarana species shows that all H. guentheri sequences clustered together as the sister group to that of Rana lateralis. In addition, the phyloge- netical relationship among Hylarana species has been discussed.
出处 《六盘水师范学院学报》 2013年第5期38-42,共5页 Journal of Liupanshui Normal University
基金 贵州省科学技术基金项目(黔科合J字LKLS[2013]06号) 贵州省教育厅自然科学基金项目(黔教合ky字(2012)064 六盘水市科技局基金项目(2010)52020-2011-01-08-04
关键词 沼水蛙 16SrRNA 克隆 系统发育进化树 Hylarana guentheri 16SrRNA gene cloning phylogenetical analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1费梁,胡淑琴,叶昌媛,黄永昭等.2010.中国动物志两栖纲(下卷)[M].北京:科学出版社.
  • 2费梁,叶昌媛,江建平.中国两栖动物及其分布彩色图鉴[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,2012:2.
  • 3Bossuyt, F.,M. C. Milinkovitch. 2000. Convergent adaptive radiations in Madagascan and Asian ranid frogs reveal covariation between larval and adult traits [J]. Proceedings oft.he National Academy of Sciences 97(12): 6585-6590.
  • 4Che, J., J. F. Pang, H. Zhao, G. F. Wu, E. M. Zhao,Y. P. Zhang. 2007. Phylogeny of Raninae (Anura: Ranidae) inferred from mi- tochondrial and nuclear sequences [J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43(1): 1-13.
  • 5Chen, L., R. W. Murphy, A. Lathrop, A. Ngo, N. LI Orlov, C. T. Ho,I. L. M. Somorjai. 2005. Taxonomic chaos in Asian ranid frogs: an initial phylogenetic resolution [J]. The Herpetological Journal 15(4): 231-243.
  • 6Cherry, L., S. Case,A. Wilson. 1977. Relative rates of morphological evolution in primates, carnivores and frogs [J]. American Zoologist 17: 910-910.
  • 7Cherty, L., S. M. Case,A. C. Wilson. 1978. Frog perspective on the morphological difference between humans arid chimpanzees [J]. Science 200(4338): 209-211.
  • 8Darriba, D., G. L. Taboada, R. Doallo,D. Posada. 2012. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing [J]. Nature Methods 9(8): 772-772.
  • 9Desper, R.,O. Gascuel. 2002. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle [J]. Journal of computational biology 9(5): 687-705.
  • 10Fouquet, A., A. Gilles, M. Vences, C. Marty, M. Blanc,N. J. GemmeU. 2007. Underestimation of Species Richness in Neotropi- cal Frogs Revealed by mtDNA Analyses [J]. Plos One 2(10): e I 109.

共引文献10

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部