期刊文献+

FRAX对骨质疏松性骨折防治的利与弊 被引量:3

The benefits and limitations of FRAX in prevention of osteoporotic fracture
原文传递
导出
摘要 骨折危险因子评估(FRAX)是世界卫生组织最新推出的预测骨折危险的评估工具。根据FRAX,低骨量和10年内髋骨骨折≥3%或骨质疏松引起的主要骨折≥20%的患者,应及时进行药物干预。其作为一种在全球大量荟萃分析基础上建立的网络评估工具,易于获取,并能简便有效的帮助临床医生判断出需要药物治疗的患者。然而,FRAX也受某些因素的限制,如没有考虑跌倒等骨折独立危险因子、没有重视剂量一效应关系、不能对已经接受治疗的患者进行评估、不能监测治疗效果等。目前FRAX不能代替已有的临床危险评估方法,还需进一步完善。 Fracture risk factor assessment (FRAX) is the latest assessment tool for fracture risk which is recommended by World Health Organization.According to it,patients with low bone density and hip fracture of ≥ 3% or a≥ 20% ten-year risk of a major osteoporosis-related fracture should be treated with drug timely.FRAX is an assessment model which is based on a series of meta-analysis around the world, as a network tool, it is easy to obtain and can help physicians to identify the patient who need a treatment effectively. However, FRAX is also limited by some factors, it does not take into account some independent risk factors for fracture such as falls and it does not pay attention to dosage-effect relationships as well.FRAX may only be used in untreated patients and it can not monitor the effect of treatment and so on.At present, FRAX can not take place of the existing clinical assessment methods, it still need to be perfected further.
出处 《国际内分泌代谢杂志》 北大核心 2014年第1期67-70,共4页 International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81070695,81270960) 教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-11-0507)
关键词 FRAX 骨质疏松性骨折 骨密度 FRAX Osteoporotic fracture Bone density
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Silverman SL,Calderon AD.The utility and limitations of FRAX: A US perspective[J].Curr Osteoporos Rep,2010,8(4): 192-197.
  • 2赵红燕,刘建民.骨折风险评估工具FRAX的临床应用[J].诊断学理论与实践,2012,11(1):21-24. 被引量:12
  • 3van den Bergh JP,van Geel TA,Lems WF,et al.Assessment of individual fracture risk:FRAX and beyond[J].Curr Osteoporos Rep,2010,8(3) : 131-137.
  • 4Watts NB.The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX(R)): applications in clinical practice[J].J Womens Healtb(Larchmt), 2011,20(4) :525-531.
  • 5Zhang Z, Ou Y, Sheng Z, et al.How to decide intervention thresholds based on FRAX in central south Chinese post- menopausal women[J].Endocrine, 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
  • 6Alzahouri K,Bahrami S,Durand-Zaleski I,et al.Cost-effeetive- hess of osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women using FRAXTM thresholds for decision [J].Joint Bone Spine,2013,80 ( 1 ) : 64-69.
  • 7Kanis JA,Johnell O, Oden A,et al.FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK[J]. Osteoporos Int,2008,19(4) :385-397.
  • 8Kanis .IA, Oden A, Johansson H, et al.FRAX and its applications to clinical practice[J].Bone, 2009,44(5 ) : 734-743.
  • 9Tromollieres FA,Pouillas JM,Drewniak N,et al.Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early post- menopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool [J].J Bone Miner Res, 2010,25(5) : 1002-1009.
  • 10Bauer DC.FRAX, falls,and fracture prediction:predicting the future[J].Arch Intern Med, 2011,171 ( 18 ) : 1661 - 1662.

二级参考文献32

  • 1Cauley JA, Lacroix AZ, Wu L, et al. Serum 25-hydro- xyvitamin D concentrations and risk for hip fractures[J]. Ann Intern Med,2008,149(4):242-250.
  • 2Holroyd C, Cooper C, Dennison E. Epidemiology of os- teoporosis [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2008,22(5):671-685.
  • 3Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group. Assessment of osteoporosis at the pri- mary health-care level[R]. WHO Collaborating Center, U- niversity of Sheffield, UK. 2008[2012-01-19].http://www. shef.ac.uk/FRAX/index.htm.
  • 4Siris E, Delmas PD. Assessment of lO-year absolute frac- ture risk: a new paradigm with worldwide application[J]. Osteoporos Int,2008,19(4):383-384.
  • 5National Osteoporosis Foundation: Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis[M]. Washington DC:National Osteoporosis Foundation,2008.
  • 6Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, et al. Case fin- ding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX--as- sessment and intervention thresholds for the UK [J]. Os- teoooms Int,2008,19(10):1395-1408.
  • 7Hamdy RC, Kiebzak GM. Variance in 10-year fracture risk calculated with and without T-scores in select sub- groups of normal and osteoporotic patients [J]. J Clin Densitom,2009,12(2):158-161.
  • 8Tremollieres FA, Pouill~s JM, Drewniak N, et al. Frac- ture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool[J]. J Bone Miner Res,2010,25(5):1002-1009.
  • 9Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Delmas PD, et al. The FRAX tool in French women: how well does it describe the real incidence of fracture in the OFELY cohort [J]. J Bone Miner Res,2010,25(10):2101-2107.
  • 10Bolland MJ, Siu AT, Mason BH, et al. Evaluation of the FRAX and Garvan fracture risk calculators in older wo- men[J]. J Bone Miner Res,2011,26(2):420-427.

共引文献11

同被引文献45

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部