期刊文献+

论“来着”的三种用法——从行、知、言三域与主观性理论看 被引量:10

On the Three Usages of the Sentence-final Particle Laizhe:A Perspective of Three Conceptual Domains and Subjectivity Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 已有研究显示,"来着"在不同语境下表现出"近过去时"、"回忆语气"及"委婉询问语气"等不同的用法。本文应用行、知、言三域的描述框架来分析这些用法之间的差异,考察"来着"在这三个认知域中的不同表意功能和句法表现;从主观性和交互主观性的角度分析这些用法之间的关联,知域用法是行域用法的主观性表达,当知域用法发展出交互主观性以后,就带有言域用法的意味。本研究显示,将认知域理论和主观性(化)理论结合有助于梳理某些虚词的共时变异和发展脉络。 Previous studies show that sentence-final particle laizhe can be used as a tense marker indicating recent past, a mood particle indicating a mental process of recalling or a way of polite questioning. In this paper, the differences among those usages are analyzed based on a theory of three conceptual domains as put forward in Sweetser (1990) and Shen (2003). And the semantic and syntactic behaviors of laizhe within those three domains are compared. It is suggested that the association of the three distinctive usages is established from a perspective of subjectivity and inter-subjectivity. Laizhe in epistemic domain is a subjective expression of its usage in content domain. Once the epistemic usage carries on intersubjectivity, it can be viewed as a speech-act use. Combination of three conceptual domains theory and (inter-)subjectivity shows great advantage to explain the synchronic variation and diachronic evolvement of laizhe.
作者 谢成名
出处 《语言教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第1期67-74,共8页 Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大研究项目<面向语义搜索的汉语词汇本体知识研究>(批准号:10JJD740008) 国家语委"十二五"规划项目<面向计算的文本蕴涵型式库的研究和建设>(编号:YB125-47)的资助
关键词 “来着” 概念域 主观性 交互主观性 laizhe three conceptual domains subjectivity inter-subjectivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献78

  • 1沈家煊.词义与认知——《从词源学到语用学》评介[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(3):77-79. 被引量:42
  • 2沈家煊.R.W.Langacker的“认知语法”[J].当代语言学,1994(1):12-20. 被引量:177
  • 3沈家煊.语言的“主观性”和“主观化”[J].外语教学与研究,2001,33(4):268-275. 被引量:2310
  • 4沈家煊.“语用否定”考察[J].中国语文,1993,(5):321-331.
  • 5Baker, P. & A. Syea (eds.). 1995. Changing Meanings, Changing Functions: Papers Relating to Grammatical ization in Contact Languages [C]. (Westminster Creolistics Series, 2. ) London: University of Westminster Press.
  • 6Boyland, J. T. 1996. Morphosyntactic change in progress: A psycholinguistic treatment [D]. Doctorial dissertation. De partment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley.
  • 7Bruyn,A. 1995. Grammaticalization in Creoles: The Development of Determiners and Relative Clauses in Sranan [M]. Amsterdam: IFOTT.
  • 8Bybee, J. 2001a. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization [A]. In M. Tomasello ( ed. ). The New Psychology of Language, Volume Ⅱ [C]. Lawrence: Erlbaum Associates.
  • 9Bybee, J. 2001b. The role of frequency in grammaticalization [A]. In R. Janda & B. Joseph (eds.). Handbook of His- torical Linguistics [C]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 10Bybee, J. 2001c. Sequentiality as basis of constituent structure [A]. In T. Givon (ed.). Typological Studies in Language [C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

共引文献2897

同被引文献150

引证文献10

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部