民初大理院选举讼案审判研究——以《最新司法判词》为基础

On Central Judicial Office Trial of Electoral Lawsuit in Early Republic of China: Based on Recent Court Verdict

民初选举诉讼面临法律内容不尽完善、地方各级审判厅审判人员专业素养良莠不齐、对选举诉讼比较陌生等诸多问题。大理院充分发挥高素质专业人才聚集的优势,通过对选举上告案件的审理,以判决书的形式回答了社会上对选举讼案审理中的疑问,对地方各级审判厅在审理此类案件中存在的偏差进行了纠正,实际上起到了补充立法的作用。当然,大理院毕竟职司司法,不可能也不应该由它解决选举诉讼中的所有问题。这些在《最新司法判词》收录的大理院选举讼案判决书中均有所体现。

There were many problems in electoral lawsuit trial in early Republic of China, such as imperfect legislation; local court judges＇ uneven professional qualities; people＇ s strangeness to electoral lawsuit, etc. By trying electoral appeal cases, Central Judicial Office gave full play to the advantages of high-quality professional talents gathered, answered the doubts from society about electoral lawsuit trials in the form of court verdicts, corrected the deviation of such cases in local courts, and played the role of the supplementary legislation in fact. Of course, Central Judicial Office was judicial organ after all, it could not and should not solve all problems in electoral lawsuits. All above these embodied in court verdicts about this kind of cases by Central Judicial Office, which was gathered in Recent Court Verdict.