中外档案学科学者引证行为比较分析

Comparative analysis of the cite behaviours in Chinese and foreign archival scholars

选择中外档案学领域典型期刊近十年的数据,从引文量、引文类型、高被引期刊、高被引作者、引用半衰期等方面比较分析国内外学者引证行为,得出:国内引文总量高于国外,但附引率和篇均引文量低于国外,外文在国内档案学论文中的引用越来越多;国内引文数量集中区间长于国外,但高引文量的论文篇数低于国外;期刊论文、图书、史料和网络文献是档案学学者主要的引用来源,网络文献的引用越来越多;国内档案学高被引文献大多为专著,国外则多为期刊论文;《档案学通讯》和Restaurator分别是国内外档案学者引用最多的期刊;冯惠玲和Neevel JG分别是国内外被引频次最高的档案学者;国内档案学者倾向于引用新文献,国外档案学引文半衰期比国内长。

By applying bibliometrics, choosing typical archives journals at home and abroad, this paper makes an analysis about the citation,style of citation,high-cited periodicals,high-cited authors and half-life of citation. It shows that the total domestic citation are higher than abroad, more and more foreign litera- tures are cited by domestic scholars; The domestic citation concentration interval is longer than abroad, but the number of papers of high citation is lower than abroad; Journal, general book, historical data and net- work are the main sources of domestic archives; The half-life abroad are longer than domestic and so on.