期刊文献+

预防性气管切开在颈髓损伤治疗中的应用价值 被引量:5

Value of preventive tracheotomy in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨预防性气管切开在完全性颈髓损伤患者治疗中的应用价值。方法对2009年1月至2012年12月河北医科大学第三医院创伤急救中心54例外伤所致C4~C8完全性颈髓损伤前路手术患者进行回顾性统计,患者术前均未实施气管切开。对符合预防性气管切开指征的患者在实施颈椎前路手术的同时行气管切开,并据此将患者分为切开组(11例)和未切开组(43例),统计并比较两组的术前时间、住院时间、低氧血症发生率、肺部感染发生率、颈部手术切口感染率、住院期间死亡率。结果预防性气管切开组与未切开组比较,患者的术前时间[(2.9±1.2)d比(5.7±4.4)d]、住院时间[(10.3±4.0)d比(16.5±9.2)d]、低氧血症发生率(9.1%比44.2%)差异有统计学意义。肺部感染发生率(9.1%比7.O%)、颈部手术切口感染率(0比2.3%)、住院期间死亡率(9.1%比27.9%)差异无统计学意义。未切开组患者中有44.2%在术后恢复期由于呼吸困难、低氧血症实施了气管切开或气管插管。结论对呼吸系统条件差、出现呼吸困难可能性大、符合预防性气管切开指征的高危患者实施气管切开可以获得满意的效果。有效改善患者的呼吸功能,降低死亡率;在严格无菌条件下操作,避免伤口感染发生。 Objective To evaluate the value of preventive tracheotomy in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 54 cases of severe C4-C8 cervical spinal cord injury patients undergoing anterior fixation. They were classified as A and B according to the criteria of American Spinal Injury Association. And no tracheotomy was performed preoperatively. The patients with a high risk of dyspnea and with an indication for preventive tracheotomy received a preventive tracheotomy right after anterior fixation. 11 cases were classified into traeheotomy group and 43 cases were in non-tracheotomy group, The preoperative and hospital stays, incidence of hyoxemia and pulmonary infection, incidence of surgical incision site infection and mortality were analyzed between two groups. Results The preoperative and hospital stays of tracheotomy group were shorter than those of non-tracheotomy group (2. 9 + 1.2 vs 5.7 +4.4 days, 10. 3 +4. 0 vs 16. 5 +9.2 days). The incidence of hyoxemia was lower in tracheotomy group (9. 1% vs 44. 2% ). There was difference existed between two groups. 44. 2% patients in the non-tracheotomy group underwent tracheotomy or endotracheal intubation for dyspnea and hyoxemia. There was no significant difference between two groups in the incidence of pulmonary infection (9. 1% vs 7. 0% ) or surgical incision site infection (0 vs 2.3% ). The mortality of non-tracheotomy group was 3.07 folds of that of tracheotomy group (9. 1% vs 27.9% ). But there was no significant statistical difference. Conclusion The preventive tracheotomy is an effective solution for the patients with respiratory compromises, a high risk of dyspnea and with an indication for preventive tracheotomy. The preventive tracheotomy for severe cervical spinal cord can improve respiratory function effectively and fixation may be performed earlier. And there are lower rates of mortality and infection. [ Key words] Cervical vertebrae; Spinal cord injury ; Therapy; Tracheotomy
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第47期3762-3765,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(30500509) 河北省自然科学基金(C2006000840、C2006000844) 河北省科技攻关项目(062761335) 河北省医学科学研究重点课题(07091)
关键词 颈椎 脊髓损伤 治疗 气管切开术 Cervical vertebrae Spinal cord injury Therapy Tracheotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Schilero GJ, Spungen AM, Bauman WA, et al. Pulmonary function and spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2009, 166:129-141.
  • 2Casha S, Christie S, A systematic review of intensive cardiopulmonary management after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma, 2011,28 : 1479-1495.
  • 3Lu K, Lee TC, Liang CL, et al. Delayed apnea in patients with mid-to lower cervical spinal cord injury. Spine, 2000,25:1332- 1338.
  • 4Berney S, Opdam H, Bellomo R, et al. An assessment of early tracheostomy after anterior cervical stabilization in patients with acute cervical spine trauma. J Trauma, 2008,64:749-753.
  • 5Branco BC, Plurad D, Green DJ, et al. Incidence and clinical predictors for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury: a national trauma databank review. J Trauma, 2011,70 : 111-115.
  • 6邵将,贾连顺,朱巍,陈雄生,袁文.颈髓损伤早期死亡影响因素与时间分布[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(8):561-565. 被引量:40
  • 7Brown R, DiMarco AF, Hoit JD, et al. Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury. Respir Care, 2006,51: 853-870.
  • 8Liu CW, Huang CC, Chen CH, et al. Prediction of severe neurogenic bowel dysfunction in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord, 2010,48:554-559.
  • 9邵将,贾连顺,朱巍,等.严重颈髓损伤早期救治措施探讨[J].中华刨伤骨科杂志,2008,10(4):338-341.

二级参考文献9

  • 1迟大明,朱悦.颈髓损伤后气管切开相关因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(12):899-902. 被引量:19
  • 2hackford SR, Mackersie RC, Holbrook TL, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic death: a population-based analysis. Arch Surg, 1993, 128: 571-575.
  • 3National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord injury: facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med, 2005, 28: 379- 380.
  • 4Liang HW, Wang YH, Lin YN, et al. Impact of age on the injury pattern and survival of people with cervical cord injuries. Spinal Cord, 2001, 39: 375-380.
  • 5Kang SW, Shin JC, Park CI, et al. Relationship between inspiratory muscle strength and cough capacity in cervical spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord, 2006, 44: 242-248.
  • 6Hughes R. The management of patients with spinal cord injury. Nurs Times, 2003, 99: 38-41.
  • 7Harrop JS, Sharan AD, Scheid EH Jr, et al. Tracheostomy placement in patients with complete cervical spinal cord injuries: American Spinal Injury Association Grade A. J Neurosurg, 2004, 100 (1 Suppl Spine): 20-23.
  • 8Lu K, Lee TC, Liang CL, et al. Delayed apnea in patients with mid - to lower cervical spinal cord injury. Spine, 2000, 25: 1332-1338.
  • 9David J, Berlowitz, Douglas J, et al. A longitudinal evaluation of sleep and breathing in the first year after cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 6:1193-1198.

共引文献40

同被引文献53

  • 1陆德林.浅谈气管切开术的几个关键问题[J].局解手术学杂志,2004,13(5):359-360. 被引量:6
  • 2迟大明,朱悦.颈髓损伤后气管切开相关因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(12):899-902. 被引量:19
  • 3曹阳,王岩峰,屠冠军,张元和,董明岩.急性颈髓损伤患者气管切开时机的选择[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(10):938-940. 被引量:14
  • 4吴德忠,吕政纲,王宝东.颈椎骨折患者的气管切开术(附12例报告)[J].中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2007,15(5):391-392. 被引量:2
  • 5No authors listed. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glanceEJ~.J Spinal Cord Med, 2012, 85:197-- 198.
  • 6KORNBLITH L Z, KUTCHER M E, CALLCUT R A, et al. Mechanical ventilation weaning and extuba- tion after spinal cord injury= a Western Trauma Asso- ciation multicenter studyEJ~. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013, 75:1060--1069.
  • 7LISSAUER M E. Benefit, timing, and technique of traeheostomy[J]. Curr Probl Surg, 2013, 50: 494-- 499.
  • 8BRANCO B C, PLURAD D, GREEN D J, et al. In- cidence and clinical predictors for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injury: a national trauma databank reviewEJ~. J Trauma, 2011,70~111--115.
  • 9MCCULLY B H, FABRICANT L, GERACI T, et al. Complete cervical spinal cord injury above C6 pre- dicts the need for traeheostomy ~J~. Am J Surg, 2014, 207: 664--668.
  • 10MENAKER J, KUFERA J A, GLASER J, et al. Admission ASIA motor score predicting the need for tracheostomy after cervical spinal cord injuryEJ]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2013, 75: 629--634.

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部