期刊文献+

胶质细胞源性神经营养因子基因修饰的施万细胞复合胶原-壳聚糖神经支架对大鼠坐骨神经缺损的修复作用 被引量:5

Transplantation of Collagen-chitosan Nerve Conduits Filled with Glial Cell Line-derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene-Modified Schwann Cells for the Repair of Sciatic Nerve Defect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胶质细胞源性神经营养因子(GDNF)基因修饰的施万细胞复合胶原-壳聚糖神经支架移植对大鼠坐骨神经长距离缺损的修复作用。方法建立大鼠左侧坐骨神经8 mm缺损模型,并随机分为3组,分别给予GDNF基因修饰的施万细胞复合胶原-壳聚糖多孔支架移植(GDNF-Sch组)、施万细胞复合胶原-壳聚糖多孔支架移植(Sch组)和自体神经移植(对照组),每组6只。分别于术后第3、6、12周行坐骨神经功能指数(SFI)检测,并在术后第12周解剖暴露桥接段坐骨神经行再生神经形态学和电生理检测,并测量胫前肌湿重。结果术后6和12周,3组大鼠术侧SFI间差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),随着治疗时间延长,GDNF-Sch组SFI恢复情况更接近于对照组,明显优于Sch组。术后12周,GDNF-Sch组和Sch组的感觉神经传导速度明显低于对照组(P<0.05),两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);GDNF-Sch组和Sch组的感觉神经波幅也明显低于对照组(P<0.05),GDNF-Sch组则明显高于Sch组(P<0.05);GDNFSch组和对照组的运动神经传导速度和波幅均明显高于Sch组(P均<0.05),但两组间差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。术后12周,对照组、Sch组和GDNF-Sch组大鼠桥接侧胫前肌湿重分别为(0.360±0.020)、(0.250±0.018)和(0.310±0.025)g,均明显低于对照侧(0.440±0.031)、(0.420±0.024)和(0.430±0.027)g(P均<0.05);GDNFSch组和对照组桥接侧胫前肌湿重均明显高于Sch组(P均<0.05),但两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 GDNF基因修饰的施万细胞复合胶原-壳聚糖神经支架能够显著增强大鼠坐骨神经长距离缺损的修复作用,这种修复效果与自体神经移植术相似。 Objective To explore the effects of the transplantation of collagen-chitosan nerve scaffold containing glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) gene modified schwann cells on the recovery of long-distance sciatic nerve defect. Methods The rat models of 8 mm long-distance sciatic nerve defect were es- tablished and divided into three groups, with 6 rats in each group. In GDNF-Sch group, the defect was repaired by GDNF modified Schwann cells combined with collagen-chitosan nerve scaffold. In Sch group, the defect was repaired by Schwann cells combined with collagen-chitosan nerve scaffold. In the control group, the defect was repaired by autologous nerve graft. Sciatic function index (SFI) was detected 3, 6, and 12 weeks after surger- y. After 12 weeks, the tibialis anterior muscle wet weight, electrophysiology, and regenerated nerve morphology were detected. Results The SFI in the operated side significantly differed among these three groups after 6 and 12 weeks (P 〈0. 05) . Along with prolonged treatment, the GDNF-Sch group had similar SFI recovery with the control group but significantly better SFI recovery than Sch group. After 12 weeks, the sensory nerve conduction velocity in the GDNF-Sch and Sch group was not significantly different ( P 〉 O. 05 ) but was significantly lower than that in the control group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . Both the GDNF-Sch group and Sch group had significantly lower sen- sory nerve amplitude comparing with the Control group ( P 〈 O. 05 ), whereas that in the GDNF-Sch group was significantly higher than that in the Sch group (P 〈 0. 05 ) . GDNF-Sch group and the control group had signifi- cantly higher motor nerve conduction velocity and amphtude than Sch group ( P 〈 O. 05 ), while no such statisti- cally significant difference was seen between the two groups (P 〉0. 05) . After 12 weeks, the wet weight of the bridging side of the tibial muscle in the control group, Sch group, and GDNF-Sch group was (0. 360 ± 0. 020), ( O. 250 ± 0. 018 ), and (0. 310 ± 0. 025 ) g; which were significantly lower than the control side [ (0. 440 ± 0. 031 ), (0. 420 ± 0. 024), and (0. 430 ± 0. 027 ) g, respectively ( P 〈 O. 05 ) ] . Muscle wet weight in bridge side of GDNF-Sch group and the control group were significantly higher than in Sch group (P 〈 0. 05 ), but it was not significantly different between the GDNF-Sch group and the control group (P 〉 0. 05) . Conehmlon Transplan- tation of collagen-chitosan nerve scaffold containing GDNF gene modified Schwann cells can remarkably facilitate sciatic nerve defect recovery, with a milimar effectiveness as autologous nerve grafting.
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第6期655-661,共7页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词 坐骨神经 修复 胶质细胞源性神经营养因子 神经支架 sciatic nerve repair glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor gene nerve scaffold
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Fu KY,Dai LG,Chiu IM,et al. Sciatic nerve regeneration by microporous nerve conduits seeded with glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor or brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene transfected neural stem cells [J]. Artif Organs,2011,35(4):363-372.
  • 2Shi JY,Liu GS,Liu LF,et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor gene transfer exerts protective effect on axons in sciatic nerve following constriction-induced peripheral nerve injury [J]. Hum Gene Ther,2011,22(6):721-731.
  • 3Keast JR,Forrest SL,Osborne PB. Sciatic nerve injury in adult rats causes distinct changes in the central projections of sensory neurons expressing different glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor family receptors [J]. J Comp Neurol,2010,518(15):3024-3045.
  • 4Ahn M,Jin JK,Moon C,et al. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor is expressed by inflammatory cells in the sciatic nerves of lewis rats with experimental autoimmune neuritis [J]. J Peripher Nerv Syst,2010,15(2):104-112.
  • 5Casella GT,Almeida VW,Grumbles RM,et al. Neurotrophic factors improve muscle reinnervation from embryonic neurons [J]. Muscle Nerve,2010,42(5):788-797.
  • 6Chen J,Chu YF,Chen JM,et al. Synergistic effects of NGF,CNTF and GDNF on functional recovery following sciatic nerve injury in rats [J]. Adv Med Sci,2010,55(1):32-42.
  • 7Eggers R,Tannemaat MR,Ehlert EM,et al. A spatio-temporal analysis of motoneuron survival,axonal regeneration and neurotrophic factor expression after lumbar ventral root avulsion and implantation [J]. Exp Neurol,2010,223(1):207-220.
  • 8黄爱华,王淑艳,梁庆成,吴云,关云谦,张愚,陈赞.人脐血间充质干细胞培养鉴定和慢病毒载体介导胶质源性神经营养因子在脐血间充质干细胞中的表达[J].中国医学科学院学报,2010,32(1):39-45. 被引量:1
  • 9Kokai LE,Bourbeau D,Weber D,et al. Sustained growth factor delivery promotes axonal regeneration in long gap peripheral nerve repair [J]. Tissue Eng Part A,2011,17(9-10):1263-1275.
  • 10Unezaki S,Yoshii S,Mabuchi T,et al. Effects of neurotrophic factors on nerve regeneration monitored by in vivo imaging in thy1-yfp transgenic mice [J]. J Neurosci Methods,2009,178(2):308-315.

二级参考文献28

  • 1江长青,胡军,向剑平,朱家恺,刘小林.猕猴组织工程化周围神经移植物的实验研究[J].中华手外科杂志,2005,21(6):372-374. 被引量:5
  • 2晋光荣,李云涛,韩群颖,刘俊华,刘培党,徐汉荣,张海军.GDNF和NO对局灶性脑缺血大鼠皮质和尾壳核神经干细胞增殖和分化的影响[J].中风与神经疾病杂志,2007,24(1):8-11. 被引量:8
  • 3Seal MI., Otero TC, Panitch A. Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration[J]. Mat Sci Eng, 2001,34 : 147.
  • 4Health CA, Rutkowski GE. The development of bioartificial nerve graft for peripheral-nerve regeneration[J].Trend in Biotech,1998 ,16 :163.
  • 5Kissel T. Advanced drug delivery review[J]. J Biomed Mater Res,2002,50(1): 99.
  • 6Seal BL, Otero TC, Panitch A. Polymeric biomaterials for tissue and organ regeneration[J]. Mat Sci Eng, 2001,34:147.
  • 7Kim BS, Mooney DJ. Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering [J].Trend Biotech, 1998,16 : 224.
  • 8Hudson TW, Evans GRD, Schmidt CE. Engineering strategies for peripheral nerve repair [J]. Orthop Clin North Am,2000,11(3) :485.
  • 9Merle M, Dellon AL, Campbell JN, et al. Complication from silicone-polymer intubulation of nerves [J]. Microsurgery, 1989,10 :130.
  • 10Lundborg G, Rosen B, Abrahamson SD, et al. Tubular repair of the median nerve in the human forearm. Preliminary findings[J]. J Hand Surg, 1994,19B: 273.

共引文献20

同被引文献65

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部