超声刀与传统方法在开放甲状腺手术的临床对比研究

Clinical Contrast Study of Ultrasound Scalpel and Traditional Method Adopted in Open Thyroid Surgery

目的在开放甲状腺手术中,将使用超声刀的临床疗效与传统方法的临床疗效进行对比研究。方法将该院在2012年3月—2013年3月收治的72例甲状腺患者随机分为两组,一组为治疗组,在手术中使用超声刀对患者进行治疗;另一组为对照组,采用传统的开刀方式进行手术治疗。最后将两组的临床疗效进行统计学对比。结果治疗组的手术时间、在手术过程中的出血量以及手术后的引流量都少于对照组,而且治疗组的切口长度也短于对照组,两组之间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床医生在开发甲状腺手术中采用超声刀,不仅可以缩短手术时间,还可以减少患者的出血量以及引流量,并减轻对患者的伤害,具有很好的临床效果。

Objective This paper aims at comparing the clinical efficacy between ultrasonic scalpel and traditional method used in open thyroid surgery. Methods 72 cases of thyroid patients admitted in our hospital from March, 2012 to March, 2013 were randomly divided into two groups, one for the treatment group, using ultrasonic scalpel in the surgery treatment, another group as the control group, using the traditional surgical approach in the surgery treatment. And the clinical efficacies of the two groups were compared statistically. Results The operation time, amount of bleeding during surgery and post-operative drainage of the treatment group were less than those of the control group, and the incision length in treatment group was shorter than that in the control group, the differences between the two groups were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Ultrasonic scalpel used in thyroid surgery by clinicians can not only shorten the operation time, but also reduce the amount of bleeding as well as drainage, and the harm to the patients with good clinical efficacy.