期刊文献+

科学哲学:脉络与走向——兼评刘大椿先生的科学哲学观 被引量:3

Philosophy of Science: Its Sequence of Thought and Trend: Comments on Liu Da-chun's Philosophy of Science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 逻辑经验主义是一场哲学运动的产物,其目标不是为科学作辩护,而是试图改造哲学。尔后,哲学家与科学史学家对逻辑经验主义观点的批判,使作为一门学科的科学哲学得以诞生。内在论的科学哲学以理解科学为目标,外在论的科学哲学以打开科学的黑箱为宗旨,两者不是替代关系和继承关系,而是平行发展的,它们代表了理解科学的两个极端。20世纪以来,这两条进路出现了相互融合的趋向。这种融合表明了科学哲学的研究正在从认识论转向知识学。 Logical Empiricism resulted from a movement of philosophy. Its aim was not to justify science, but to try to reform philosophy. Thereafter, the critiques of philosophers and historians of science on science made philosophy of science as a subject emerge. Internalism aimed to understand science, while externalism aimed to open the black box of science. Their relation was not substitutional or inheritable, but parallel. They represented two poles of understanding science. Since the twentieth century, the two approaches have begun to fuse. It indicates that the study in philosophy of science is turning from epistemology of science to science of knowledge.
作者 成素梅
出处 《哲学分析》 2013年第6期20-30,191,共11页 Philosophical Analysis
关键词 理解科学 批判科学 认识论 understanding science the critiques on science epistemology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

共引文献7

同被引文献24

  • 1吴彤.走向实践优位的科学哲学——科学实践哲学发展述评[J].哲学研究,2005(5):86-93. 被引量:43
  • 2竹尾治一郎编著.《科学哲学》,桂起权、王建新译,上海译文出版社,1994,第1-2页.
  • 3J. Fodor, "Special Sciences: Or, the Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis", Synthese, 28, 1974, pp. 97 - 115.
  • 4Steve Fuller, "The Art of Being Human : A Project for General Philosophy of Science", Journal for General Philosophy of Science, July 2012, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp. 113 - 123.
  • 5Hans-rg rheinberger, On historicizing epistemology : An Essay, translated by David Fernbach, Stanford University Press, 2010, p. 1.
  • 6Ronald N. Giere, Scientific Prespectivism, The University of Chicago Press, 2006, pp. 1 - 15.
  • 7Peter Galison and David J. Stump, eds. , The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Context, and Power, Stanford University Press, 1996, pp. 101 - 117.
  • 8S. D. Mitchell, Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity and Policy, University of Chicago Press, 2009, pp. 12 - 13.
  • 9Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino, C. Kenneth Waters, eds. , Scientific Pluralism, University of Minnesota Press, 2006, pp. vii - xxvii.
  • 10Karl Leidlmair, ed. , After Cognitivism : A Reassessment of Cognitive Science and Philosophy, Springer, 2009, p. 3.

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部