摘要
目的:比较Intralase飞秒激光和AmadeusⅡ微型角膜板层刀制瓣行准分子激光角膜原位磨镶术(laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)的安全性和有效性。方法:应用Intralase飞秒激光和AmadeusⅡ微型角膜板层刀对65例屈光不正患者做角膜瓣,Intralase飞秒激光组和AmadeusⅡ微型角膜板层刀组分别按屈光度≤-3.00D为A组,-3.00<B组<-6.00D,≥-6.00D为C组。观察比较术后1 mo各组的视力、总像差、球差、彗差和三叶草差。结果:术后1 mo,Intralase飞秒激光组达到或超过术前最佳矫正视力者(best corrected visual acuity,BCVA)60眼(93.8%),AmadeusⅡ微型角膜板层刀达到或超过术前BCVA者61眼(92.4%),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.421)。在不同屈光度分组中总像差、彗差、球差和三叶草差两组相比都没有显著差异。结论:飞秒激光制瓣和微型角膜板层刀制瓣行LASIK术后视力、总像差、球差、彗差和三叶草差两组没有显著差异,都是安全有效的方法。
AIM:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis ( LASIK) by Intralase femtosecond laser or Amadeus II microkeratome.
METHODS: Flap creation for LASIK was performed using IntraLase femtosecond laser ( Intralase group ) or Amadeus II microkeratome ( Amadeus group) in 130 eyes with ametropia.Patients of Intralase group and Amadeus group were divided into three groups with different refractive degrees:≤-3.00D was A,-3.00 RESULTS: One month after LASIK, the postoperative vision of 60 eyes (93.7%) were the same as or better than preoperative BCVA in Intralase group and the postoperative vision of 61 eyes (92.4%) were the same as or better than preoperative BSCVA in Amadeus group. There was no significant difference between two groups (P=0.421).There was no significant difference in RMS values, spherical aberration, coma and trefoil between the groups in refractive degrees.
CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in postoperative vision, RMS values, spherical aberration, coma and trefoil between Intralase femtosecond laser group and Amadeus Ⅱ microkeratome group. Both methods are effective and safe.
出处
《国际眼科杂志》
CAS
2014年第1期181-183,共3页
International Eye Science
关键词
飞秒激光
角膜板层刀
像差
femtosecond laser
microkeratome
aberration