期刊文献+

经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗上段嵌顿性输尿管结石患者的Meta分析 被引量:11

Meta-analysis of PCNL versus URL in treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与输尿管镜碎石术(URL)治疗上段嵌顿性输尿管结石患者的有效性及安全性,为临床的合理治疗提供参考。方法:计算机检索Cochrane图书馆(2013年第6期)、Medline、EMBASE、WebofKnowledge、ScienceDirect、OVID及CBM、CNKI、万方等数据库,收集上述两种手术方式对上段输尿管嵌顿性结石患者的随机对照和非随机对照试验,并提取相关数据后采用RevMan5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果:总共纳入7项研究,随机对照试验4项,非随机对照试验3项。随机对照试验中PCNL较URL患者术后3日内结石清除率高(OR=14.78;95%CI 6.60-33.09)、二次手术率低(OR=0.13;95%CI 0.03-0.66)、术后住院时间长(OR=3.51;95%CI 2.05-4.98),但术后发热情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);非随机对照试验中PCNL较URL的术后3日内结石清除率高(OR=21.63;95%CI 3.92-119.30)、二次手术率低(OR=0.05;95%CI 0.01-0.25)、术后住院时间长(OR=2.85;95%CI 2.40-3.31),术后血尿更多见(OR=2.37;95%CI 1.16-4.85),但术后发热情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:PCNL治疗上段嵌顿性输尿管结石患者较URL效果更理想。 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi so as to provide reference for clinical reasonable treatment. Method: The electronic databases including Cochrane library (Issue 6, 2013), Medline, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect, OVID, CBM, CNKI and WANFANG were searched, and the randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials about the two kinds of operation method for ureteral impacted stones were collected. Then we analyzed the extracted relevant data with the help of RevMan 5. 1 software. Result: Seven studies including four randomized controlled trials and three nonrandomized controlled trials were taken. The results were shown as follows. PCNL was found higher stone-free rate at three days postoperatively (ORal4.78; 95% CI 6.60-33.09), lower re-operation rate (OR=0.13; 95% CI 0.03-0.66) and longer postoperative hospital stay (OR= 3.51; 95 %CI 2.05-4.98) than URL in the randomized controlled trials. However, the difference of incidence of postoperative fever was not significant (P〉0.05). In the nonrandomized controlled trials PCNL was associated with higher stone-free rate at three days postoperatively (OR: 21.63; 95 % CI 3.92-119.30), lower re-operation rate (OR: 0.05; 95%CI 0. 01-0. 25), longer postoperative hospital stay (OR=2.85; 95%CI 2. 40-3. 31), more postoperativehematuria (OR:2.37; 95%CI 1.16-4.85). Nevertheless, the difference of incidence of postoperative fever showed no statistical significant (P〉0.05). Conclusion: PCNL is superior to URL in treatment of impacted upper ureteral calculi.
出处 《临床泌尿外科杂志》 2014年第1期14-17,20,共5页 Journal of Clinical Urology
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(编号201211A048)
关键词 经皮肾镜取石术 输尿管镜碎石术 上段输尿管结石 嵌顿性结石 percutaneous nephrolithotomy ureteroscopic lithotripsy upper ureteral calculi impacted stone
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Gu Xiao-jian,Lu Jian Lin,Xu Yan.Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy[J].World Journal of Urology.2013(6)
  • 2Mostafa Khalil.Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy[J].Urology Annals.2013(2)
  • 3Zhongsheng Yang,Leming Song,Donghua Xie,Min Hu,Zuofeng Peng,Tairong Liu,Chuance Du,Jiuqing Zhong,Wen Qing,Shulin Guo,Lunfeng Zhu,Lei Yao,Jianrong Huang,Difu Fan,Zhangqun Ye.Comparative Study of Outcome in Treating Upper Ureteral Impacted Stones Using Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Aid of Patented System or Transurethral Ureteroscopy[J].Urology.2012(6)
  • 4Islam A. Ghoneim,Mohamed N. El-Ghoneimy,Ashraf E. El-Naggar,Khaled M. Hammoud,Mohamed Y. El-Gammal,Ahmed A. Morsi.Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Impacted Upper Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Stented and Non-stented Techniques[J].Urology.2010(1)
  • 5Yung-Shun Juan,Jung-Tsung Shen,Ching-Chia Li,Chii-Jye Wang,Shu-Mien Chuang,Chun-Hsiung Huang,Wen-Jeng Wu.Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in the Management of Impacted, Large, Proximal Ureteral Stones[J].Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences.2008(4)
  • 6Christian Seitz,Enis Tanovic,Zeljko Kikic,Harun Fajkovic.Impact of Stone Size, Location, Composition, Impaction, and Hydronephrosis on the Efficacy of Holmium:YAG-Laser Ureterolithotripsy[J].European Urology.2007(6)
  • 7Hossein Karami,Amir Haji Mohammad Mehdi Arbab,Seyed Jalil Hosseini,Mohammad Reza Razzaghi,Navid Reza Simaei.Impacted Upper-Ureteral Calculi >1 cm: Blind Access and Totally Tubeless Percutaneous Antegrade Removal or Retrograde Approach?[].Journal of Endourology.2006
  • 8Sun Xiaowen,Xia Shujie,Lu Jun,Liu Haitao,Han Bangmin,Li Weiguo.Treatment of large impacted proximal ureteral stones: randomized comparison of percutaneous antegrade ureterolithotripsy versus retrograde ureterolithotripsy[].Journal of endourology / Endourological Society.2008
  • 9Maheshwar P N,Oswal A T,Andankar M,et al.Is antegradeureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upperureteral calculi[].Journal of Endourology.1999
  • 10Manohar T,Ganpule Arvind,Desai Mahesh.Comparative evaluation of Swiss LithoClast 2 and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for impacted upper-ureteral stones[].Journal of endourology / Endourological Society.2008

同被引文献114

  • 1冉强,李仁举,林杰.肾结石手术治疗的现状及研究进展[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(5):316-320. 被引量:8
  • 2邓超雄,王庆堂,杨航,陈卫国,王亮.经皮肾造瘘输尿管镜钬激光治疗复杂性肾结石[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(12):975-976. 被引量:20
  • 3You JH, Kim YG, Kim MK. Flexible ureteroscopic renal stone extrac- tion during laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in patients with large upper ureteral stone and small renal stones [ J ]. Can Urol Assoc J,2014,8 (9- 10) :591-594.
  • 4Kanno T, Kubota M, Sakamoto H, et al. Determining the efficacy of ul- trasonography for the detection of ureteral stone [ J ]. Urology, 2014,84 (3) :533-537.
  • 5Lee SW, Woo SH, Yoo DS, et al. Effect of tamsulosin on stone expul- sion in proximal ureteral calculi:an open-label randomized controlled trial[ J ]. Int J Clin Praet,2014,68 (2) :216-221.
  • 6Park YH, Lee HE, Park JY, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of tamsulosin after extracorporeal shock wave litho- tfipsy for a single proximal ureteral stone[ J]. Korean J Urol,2013,54 (8) :527-530.
  • 7He Y, Li NN, Chen Z, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoendoscopic single- site ureterolithotomy for upper ureteral stone disease [ J ]. Scand J Urol,2013,47 (6) :515-520.
  • 8Khalil M. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracor- poreal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium : YAG laser lithotripsy [ J ]. Urol Ann,2013,5 ( 2 ) : 88 -92.
  • 9Fam X I, Singam P, Ho C C, et al. Ureteral stricture formation after ureteroscope treatment of impacted cal- culi: A prospective study[J]. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56 (1) : 63--67.
  • 10Srougi V, Padovani G P, Marchini G S, et al. Out- comes of surgical treatment of ureteral strictures after laser ureterolithotripsy for impacted stones[J]. Can J Urol, 2015, 22(6): 8079-8084.

引证文献11

二级引证文献153

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部